|
First unread post | | 10 posts | | Page 1 of 1 |
I think this one is a LITTLE bit better than the last shot, but I think you guys have convinced me that I'm just not going to get a real good shot unless I get more equipment. It's hit or miss whether I can get the auto-focus to work on this tiny guy. And my eyes are pretty bad so manual focus is hit or miss, too. My tripod is so laughable that the shutter action probably makes it jiggle.
this was shot at 1/80 5.6 ISO 200 Since the biggest problem to me seems to be sharpness, do you think I would gain anything by going to 400 ISO? Last edited by backyarder1 on Thu Sep 29, 2005 6:15 pm, edited 3 times in total. |
|
|
by Steve Cirone
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:09 am
|
Posts: 2262
Joined: 29 May 2005 Location: El Cajon, California Member #:00583 |
||
|
by backyarder1
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:48 am
|
Posts: 101
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 |
||
|
by Paul Klenck
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 10:34 am
|
Posts: 18232
Joined: 21 Aug 2003 Location: suburban Chicago Member #:00221 |
||
|
by AForns
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:05 am
|
Posts: 25782
Joined: 7 Dec 2003 Location: Coral Gables, FL Member #:00233 |
||
|
by backyarder1
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:11 am
|
Posts: 101
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 |
||
|
by AForns
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:21 am
|
Posts: 25782
Joined: 7 Dec 2003 Location: Coral Gables, FL Member #:00233 |
||
|
by Mike Maples
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:34 am
|
Posts: 1471
Joined: 12 Apr 2005 |
||
|
by backyarder1
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:43 am
|
Posts: 101
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 |
||
|
by Alan Murphy
on Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:32 pm
|
Posts: 27330
Joined: 20 Aug 2003 Location: Houston, Texas Member #:00014 |
||
|
10 posts | | Page 1 of 1 |