Peek-a-boo I see You


Posted by phurd on Thu Dec 09, 2004 12:29 am

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 8 posts | 
Image
I know, why the tree trunk here. I did get a full body shot of him, but what I liked about this shot was the bird was hiding behind this tree trunk.
He he would pop out to see what I was doing then right back. Sometimes just his head would peak around and others about half the body. This went on for 20 minutes. A small crab was climbing up the side of the tree, and he finally jumped out to catch it. Notice the iris, from the light side to the dark side.


300mm
1/250 sec, f/14
ISO: 400
Flash: On
Pat Hurd

"The only bad picture is the one you did not take. "

Posted by:
phurd
Forum Contributor
Location: Lehigh Acres, Florida
Posts: 293
Joined: 6 Nov 2004

   

by Juli Wilcox on Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:07 am
User avatar
Juli Wilcox
Editor in Chief
Posts: 3373
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Location: Upper Great Plains
Member #:00010
Yes, interesting size difference in the eyes. I feel the tree trunk and overexposure of the bird reduce the impact somewhat. You might consider cropping in a bit tighter. Any time there is a large expanse of oof area closer to the viewer such as the trunk, that will be the area that tends to draw focus, especially if it is lighter. Is there a particular reason you used f/14? :)
[b]Juli Wilcox[/b]
[b]Former Editor in Chief, NSN[/b]
 

by KK Hui on Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:54 am
User avatar
KK Hui
Moderator
Posts: 42681
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
Member #:00536
I like the story, Pat!
A good behavior shot ... :roll:
KK Hui  FRPS
Fellow of The Royal Photographic Society
Personal Website | Portfolio @ Flickr

Lifetime Member NSN 0536
 

by phurd on Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:08 am
phurd
Forum Contributor
Posts: 293
Joined: 6 Nov 2004
Location: Lehigh Acres, Florida
Juli Wilcox wrote:Is there a particular reason you used f/14? :)
Hi Juli, there was no real reason for the f/14. What I was doing this day, was trying to find a subject and shot at various settings, with flash and without, different f stops, and so on. Then compare them later to see what the results would be. This started because I have doing some readings and trying to work on my skills, so lots of experiments. One reason I like this site, great input from everyone, and for a newbee at this, I cannot say how much I have learned.
Pat Hurd

"The only bad picture is the one you did not take. "
 

by Alan Murphy on Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:18 am
User avatar
Alan Murphy
Lifetime Member
Posts: 27330
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Member #:00014
A bit soft but the story brings life to the image.
Alan Murphy
NSN 0014
www.alanmurphyphotography.com
 

by Fabs Forns on Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:55 pm
User avatar
Fabs Forns
Lifetime Member
Posts: 17752
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: Coral Gables, Fl
Member #:00393
Red X :( :( :( :(
 

by Fabs Forns on Thu Dec 09, 2004 2:57 pm
User avatar
Fabs Forns
Lifetime Member
Posts: 17752
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: Coral Gables, Fl
Member #:00393
It came back to life!

Very funny look on his face, I love it! And the differences in the eyes is very interesting :)
 

by Mike Wilson on Fri Dec 10, 2004 1:40 am
User avatar
Mike Wilson
Forum Contributor
Posts: 16364
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
A fun post. The difference in the pupil size is interesting, good eye Pat!
Mike Wilson
San Diego, Ca
[url=http://www.naturescapes.net/membership.htm]NSN 0047[/url]
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
8 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group