Dragonfly


Posted by AndrewC on Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:05 pm

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 6 posts | 
Image
D2H, polarised flashes and lens, 200mm f4 at f18, manual flash exposure

Wish I could think of a more imaginative title but ...

This is the effect I was looking for - I deliberately chose a distant background I could render close to black by using flash for my main light. I'm a bit dissappointed in being unable to eliminate all the highlights (this image is "straight out of the camera" with just a bit of sharpening) by sing polarisers but I suspect that with so many curved reflecting surfaces on a dragonfly it is close to impossible to eliminate all hot spots. I'll probably try again with my Apollo softbox and see what I get with that.
Andrew

Is that an accurate dictionary ? [i]Charlie Eppes[/i]

http://www.tirpor.com

User avatar
Posted by:
AndrewC
Forum Contributor
Location: Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium
Posts: 2361
Joined: 21 Aug 2003

   

by Wil Hershberger on Tue Jul 27, 2004 1:51 pm
Wil Hershberger
Forum Contributor
Posts: 7577
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Location: Eastern WV
Awesome shot. I think that the polarizers worked well. The whites are a little hot looking but easily fixed.
Thanks for posting and for the details behind this shot.
[url=http://www.cricketman.blogspot.com][b]Wil Hershberger[/b][/url] | [b]NSN0025[/b]
[url=http://www.natureimagesandsounds.com/workshops/index.html][b]Nature Images and Sounds Nature Photography Workshops[/b][/url]
 

by eagle43 on Wed Jul 28, 2004 9:46 am
eagle43
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1512
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Location: Miami, Fl/Atlanta, Ga
Andrew your self-critique is right on. But still a nice image especially the BG.

Roy
 

by Michael Brown on Wed Jul 28, 2004 11:40 am
User avatar
Michael Brown
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8196
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Cayce, South Carolina
Still a cool shot!! 8)
[b]Michael Brown
NSN 0056[/b]

[url=http://www.macroartinnature.com/]"Macro Art In Nature" - Website[/url]
 

by Wayne Nicholas on Thu Jul 29, 2004 6:23 pm
User avatar
Wayne Nicholas
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5751
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Houston, TX USA
Member #:00046
Andrew, female Blue-Dashers are just hard to shoot and get perfect. They do reflect a lot of light. I think the polarizers kept the wings from shining too much. Overall, I think with a small bit of PS work, this image should be fine. Nice image.

Thanks for the details.
[b]Wayne Nicholas[/b]
[b]Nanpa Member[/b]
[url=http://www.naturescapes.net/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=25][b]Texas Regional Moderator[/b][/url]
[color=blue][url=http://www.NicholasNaturePhoto.com][b]NicholasNaturePhoto[/b][/color][/url]
[color=blue][url=http://waynenicholas.naturescapes.net][b]Naturescapes Portfolio[/b][/color][/url]
[b]NSN 0046[/b]
 

by AndrewC on Thu Jul 29, 2004 9:50 pm
User avatar
AndrewC
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2361
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, Belgium
Wayne Nicholas wrote:Andrew, female Blue-Dashers are just hard to shoot and get perfect. They do reflect a lot of light. I think the polarizers kept the wings from shining too much. Overall, I think with a small bit of PS work, this image should be fine. Nice image.

Thanks for the details.
Aha - it's a female Blue Dasher is it ? Thanks :)
Andrew

Is that an accurate dictionary ? [i]Charlie Eppes[/i]

http://www.tirpor.com
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
6 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group