Day's End


Posted by thapamd on Tue Jun 08, 2004 1:13 am

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 11 posts | 
Tonight's sunset from Carkeek Park in Seattle. Enjoy!

1Ds & 17-40 f/4 L lens. 2 stop hard grad ND filter.
Image
Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap, but memories are priceless.

Mahesh (NSN 0084)

http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com

Posted by:
thapamd
Regional Moderator
Location: Seattle, WA (USA)
Member #:00084
Posts: 775
Joined: 22 Aug 2003

   

by gigo on Tue Jun 08, 2004 2:37 am
gigo
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1136
Joined: 17 May 2004
Location: Miami, Florida (USA)
very beautiful mahesh ! (i am not surprised :p )

you've captured the atmosphere of the moment !

now my turn to try to catch up to you ;-)
 

by Jerry Merrell on Tue Jun 08, 2004 7:16 am
User avatar
Jerry Merrell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 3637
Joined: 15 Nov 2003
Location: Central Florida
Member #:00210
Lovely shot, Mahesh.
Jerry Merrell
 

by prashant on Tue Jun 08, 2004 7:21 am
prashant
Forum Contributor
Posts: 910
Joined: 25 Aug 2003
Location: UK
beautiful mahesh
[b]PrashanTeju Khapane[/b]
[i]Photography, Paintings & Travelogues [/i]
http://www.prashanteju.de
 

by Michael Brown on Tue Jun 08, 2004 7:58 am
User avatar
Michael Brown
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8196
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Cayce, South Carolina
There is usually one word that consistantly comes to mind when viewing your images Mahesh, and that word is "beautiful"! I need not have to say anything else!! :)

I do have a question for you that I just thought about.

I remember years ago the talk involved about many of the different lenses used for landscape photography and how certain ones would eliminate or help to reduce the distortion in the horizons. It seemed to be a big "no no" back then!

This shot you have here has some distortion/curve in the horizon, but I have noticed from other individual's comments in this thread, and with other landscape images from different photographers, that distortion in the horizon is rarely commented on anymore.

Is this or has this become more acceptable in landscape photography?
I don't shoot many landscapes I admit, but still I am curious about this.

Thanks Mahesh, and once again, ................. "beautiful" image!

Mike
[b]Michael Brown
NSN 0056[/b]

[url=http://www.macroartinnature.com/]"Macro Art In Nature" - Website[/url]
 

by cogard on Tue Jun 08, 2004 10:10 am
User avatar
cogard
Forum Contributor
Posts: 225
Joined: 15 Feb 2004
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Great shot Doc...I love how the driftwood actually looks like a fish :lol:
Charlie O.
http://www.pbase.com/cogard
 

by Ken Cravillion on Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:09 am
User avatar
Ken Cravillion
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8534
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Oshkosh!!!
Member #:00072
I noticed the distortion too...

Nice image overall. The color is great. Good choice of FG as well.
Ken Cravillion
 

by Paul Klenck on Tue Jun 08, 2004 9:59 pm
User avatar
Paul Klenck
Forum Contributor
Posts: 18232
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: suburban Chicago
Member #:00221
All the patterns and textures in the wood, sand, sea, clouds are wonderous.
Paul Klenck
Moderator

Website: [url]http://www.klenck.com[/url]
Twitter: [url]http://twitter.com/PaulKlenck[/url]
 

by thapamd on Wed Jun 09, 2004 11:43 am
thapamd
Regional Moderator
Posts: 775
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, WA (USA)
Member #:00084
Michael Brown wrote:There is usually one word that consistantly comes to mind when viewing your images Mahesh, and that word is "beautiful"! I need not have to say anything else!! :)

I do have a question for you that I just thought about.

I remember years ago the talk involved about many of the different lenses used for landscape photography and how certain ones would eliminate or help to reduce the distortion in the horizons. It seemed to be a big "no no" back then!

This shot you have here has some distortion/curve in the horizon, but I have noticed from other individual's comments in this thread, and with other landscape images from different photographers, that distortion in the horizon is rarely commented on anymore.

Is this or has this become more acceptable in landscape photography?
I don't shoot many landscapes I admit, but still I am curious about this.

Thanks Mahesh, and once again, ................. "beautiful" image!

Mike
Thank you for the thoughtful comments, Mike. A somewhat curved horizon doesn't bother me as much as a tilted one. I enjoy the perspective it gives. As far as how it's accepted by the landscape community, I have no idea...don't much care either :)
Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap, but memories are priceless.

Mahesh (NSN 0084)

http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
 

by stevebein on Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:18 pm
stevebein
Lifetime Member
Posts: 4423
Joined: 25 Aug 2003
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Member #:00137
beautiful. The horizon distortion is just the curve of the earth :D :D :D :D 8)
Steve Bein
drbein@aol.com


Last edited by stevebein on Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 

by E.J. Peiker on Sat Jun 12, 2004 7:04 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
A beautiful shot!!!

I am stunned by the extreme amount of barrel distortion on this lens - an L lens should not have that much - especially not that close to the center - I think there is something wrong with the lens. There is no way I would accept this optic in its present state for landscape photography.
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
11 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group