Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 8 posts | 
by Rocky Sharwell on Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:53 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
I was wondering how others out there convert underexposed raw files. I am using Breezebrowser, Photoshop, and the Adobe Camera Raw plugin.

Do you adjust the compensation in Breezebrowser, Camera Raw plugin, or do you use a photoshop levels adjustment? I typically use the camera raw plug in but wondered how others do it.

Thanks
Rocky Sharwell
 

by Greg Downing on Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
User avatar
Greg Downing
Publisher
Posts: 19318
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Member #:00001
It's best done in photo-shop where you have precise control over the process, but you can also see what you are doing. Always do your conversion and adjustments in 16bit mode, particularly when converting underexposed shots.
Greg Downing
Publisher, NatureScapes.Net
[url=http://www.gdphotography.com/]Visit my website for images, workshops and newsletters![/url]
 

by E.J. Peiker on Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:44 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Tim Grey teaches that you should make the exposure adjustment prior to RAW conversion if possible to lose the least possible amount of data.

So there you go, two different answers :) both with their own merits. Max data or max flexibility.

In reality, what I do is I correct gross exposure adjustment prior to RAW conversion and then do the fine adjustments and selective adjustments in Photoshop on the converted file and as much of it in 16 Bit mode as possible.
 

by Bob Ettinger on Mon Sep 15, 2003 1:46 pm
Bob Ettinger
Regional Moderator
Posts: 3111
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Member #:00148
Rocky,

I do the same as E.J.
Bob Ettinger
 

by Sandy Mossberg on Mon Sep 15, 2003 2:08 pm
User avatar
Sandy Mossberg
Lifetime Member
Posts: 5802
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Location: Boynton Beach, FL USA
Rocky, I'm with EJ on this one. Before converting, get your RAW file to about 1/3 EV less than what you want as an end product. Then do the fine tuning after conversion in PS.
Sandy Mossberg
Boynton Beach, Florida, USA
[url=http://www.sandymossberg.com][b]SandyMossberg.com[/b][/url]
NSN 0015
 

by Greg Downing on Mon Sep 15, 2003 3:17 pm
User avatar
Greg Downing
Publisher
Posts: 19318
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Member #:00001
Learn somethin' every day :roll:
Greg Downing
Publisher, NatureScapes.Net
[url=http://www.gdphotography.com/]Visit my website for images, workshops and newsletters![/url]
 

by Chas on Mon Sep 15, 2003 7:11 pm
Chas
Lifetime Member
Posts: 6891
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: NC
Member #:00037
Rocky, Capture One really excels in tweaking exposure errors. Adjustment curves, levels, EV comp. and additional tools are available in C1 to modify the exposure better than most other programs prior to conversion.

Best,

Chas
Charles Glatzer M.Photog, Canon Explorer of Light, https://about.me/charlesglatzer
Check out www.shootthelight.com for info on workshops, seminars, appearances, etc.
NSN 0037

  
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:39 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
Thanks for all of the replies. I am really thinking about Capture One. I have read many good things about it. Looks like the topic for this week will be noise reduction--I shot a bunch of stuff this week at ISO 800 with my 1D (by error)!
Rocky Sharwell
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
8 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group