Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 14 posts | 
by Rocky Sharwell on Wed Dec 10, 2003 9:04 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
Greetings:

I had these funnly looking curved lines appear in some images from Bosque taken at F36 and F45. The lines appeared when I used different camera bodies--So I am fairly certain it is the lens. The lens worked fine otherwise. Any ideas?

http://www.naturescapes.net/memberpics/ ... hohihw.jpg
http://www.naturescapes.net/memberpics/ ... 5mqvx0.jpg

Thanks!
Rocky Sharwell
 

by Wil Hershberger on Wed Dec 10, 2003 9:46 am
Wil Hershberger
Forum Contributor
Posts: 7577
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Location: Eastern WV
Have you looked into the rear of the lens while pointed toward a light? What does it look like? Are these shots the full frame?
[url=http://www.cricketman.blogspot.com][b]Wil Hershberger[/b][/url] | [b]NSN0025[/b]
[url=http://www.natureimagesandsounds.com/workshops/index.html][b]Nature Images and Sounds Nature Photography Workshops[/b][/url]
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Wed Dec 10, 2003 10:01 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
Will:

The shots are full frame.

I did not see anything obviously wrong looking into the rear of the lens. I did buy some long 100% cotton swabs and am really tempted to try and clean it with eclipse solution.
Rocky Sharwell
 

by Cliff Beittel on Wed Dec 10, 2003 10:40 am
Cliff Beittel
Forum Contributor
Posts: 3210
Joined: 3 Sep 2003
At the back of the lens is not lens, but the drop-in filter, one of the functions of which is to keep dirt out of the back of the lens. Have you checked the filter?
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:11 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
This looks like either stress lines or dirt on the rear filter or perhaps, but less likely large streaks on the front elements. Smaller apertures will bring these things more into focus.
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Wed Dec 10, 2003 1:05 pm
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
I will check the rear filter tonight--I forgot all about it even being there.
Rocky Sharwell
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Sat Dec 13, 2003 11:54 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
Update:

The gelatin filter appears to quite dusty--but it doesn't show anything like the lines that appear in the photographs. I am planning on blowing off the dust (w/ bulb) and seeing what ahppenes.

Any suggestions?
Thanks
Rocky Sharwell
 

by Joe Elliott on Sat Dec 13, 2003 10:54 pm
Joe Elliott
Forum Contributor
Posts: 493
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: North Carolina
Looks like out of focus condensation on an internal lens element to me. Or, where condensation and dust have mixed and dried on an internal lens element. That would be my guess.
Joe Elliott - http://www.redbubble.com/people/happilyretired
 

by KK Hui on Sun Dec 14, 2003 2:17 am
User avatar
KK Hui
Moderator
Posts: 42681
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
Member #:00536
Rocky Sharwell wrote: ... The lines appeared when I used different camera bodies--So I am fairly certain it is the lens. The lens worked fine otherwise. Any ideas? ...
You did not say what bodies, film or/and digital ... ??? Never rule out the body at this point if I were you, Rocky!
KK Hui  FRPS
Fellow of The Royal Photographic Society
Personal Website | Portfolio @ Flickr

Lifetime Member NSN 0536
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:37 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
KK:

D10-10D and 1D are the bodies involved.

I got rid of the dust on the filter and cleaned the front element (which wasn't too dirty). It was gray all day yesterday so I will have to wait to see the result...
Rocky Sharwell
 

by E.J. Peiker on Mon Dec 15, 2003 9:41 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Actually after looking at the pics again, I think a small branch or stick or grass probably fell into the lens hood and was up against the front element while taking these shots.
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Mon Dec 15, 2003 1:49 pm
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
I had a very productive lunch break. I believe I have solved the problem!

On my way to lunch I loaded a card into the camera--and mounted the 600 w/o the hood. I turned to the smallest aperture (F32), and handholding pointed at the blue sky. No bad lines appeared.

I put on my older 1.4TC--turned to F36 and F45 fired a few shots at each aperture--the lines were clearly visible.

I put on my almost brand new 1.4 TC--fired a few shots at F36/F45 no lines.

In case you are wondering why I have two 1.4 Converters--I bought a second one so that a friend can use my 300F4 and get some extra reach when we go out shooting.
Rocky Sharwell
 

by KK Hui on Wed Dec 17, 2003 4:34 am
User avatar
KK Hui
Moderator
Posts: 42681
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
Member #:00536
That's good that you tracked down the source of the cause, Rocky!
But, what's wrong with the 1.4TC that is giving you this problem? :?:
KK Hui  FRPS
Fellow of The Royal Photographic Society
Personal Website | Portfolio @ Flickr

Lifetime Member NSN 0536
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Wed Dec 17, 2003 8:35 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2995
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
KK:

I haven't even looked at the TC yet--I am saving that for the Christmas holiday. I'm just glad it isn't the 600!
Rocky Sharwell
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
14 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group