Monitors

bradmangas wrote: The only advice I would give, which I have for some time now, is, for critical photo editing, and especially if you plan on producing a lot of physical prints from images, I would not go with a higher resolution display such as in the 4k and up class. This is due to the interrelations techniques that are determined to render an image at 4k (or the 3840x2160 if that is this case).

I can't say with certain, details about this specific display, but there is no legitimate need for the 4k genre in photo editing, and can, inadvertently cause issues. Apple displays are very bad at this interpolation and will actually skew an image and or pixels when the interpolation is done. This can effect critical editing if that is the case.

For most, the higher resolution display such as 4k and higher won't be a problem so it is rather user specific depending on needs. Just something to be aware of.

bradmangas wrote: The only advice I would give, which I have for some time now, is, for critical photo editing, and especially if you plan on producing a lot of physical prints from images, I would not go with a higher resolution display such as in the 4k and up class. 

E.J. Peiker wrote: Only if you are using old software that doesn’t scale fonts.  If you are still using Photoshop CS6 then it can be an issue although there are cumbersome workarounds.  But if you are on CC or any other modern software it is no issue.

ChrisRoss wrote:
Back to the OP question, if you can afford it buy an Eizo.  My view is you spend all this money on the latest photo gear and for most users 99% of the work we produce from the latest and greatest gear - the only place you ever see the final output is on your monitor!

imagenes_vivas wrote: I have the same problem. My old iMac goes to my wife and I will buy a MacMini M2Pro or MacStudioM1 Max (still deciding).

But I will need a monitor and the ones able to show 99% of the AdobeRGB color space (like BenQ SW271C) are pretty expensive.

Is a bad move to buy a not so expensive like the BenQ PD2705 or 2725 that does not cover the full AdobeRGB space? In fact my current iMac 5K Retina only covers around the 80% of Adobe RGB. The SW cost 1600 € against 1000 € for the PD.