Motif: Valley of Fire Sunset


Posted by Corey Deards on Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:57 pm

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 9 posts | 
Image
This is cropped from a single file. I wish I had shot a couple & could have combined them for a larger file size :( .
Valley Of Fire State Park, NV
Canon EOS 10D, 24-85 @ 24, 1/10, f22, ISO 100, Self timer.
Thank you for looking.
Corey Deards
[b]The shortest distance between two points is........grossly over rated![/b]
[url]http://www.deardsphotography.com[/url]

User avatar
Posted by:
Corey Deards
Forum Contributor
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 372
Joined: 22 Aug 2003

   

by E.J. Peiker on Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:40 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Another excellent shot! Well done!
 

by Harvey Edelman on Tue Jul 27, 2004 9:58 pm
Harvey Edelman
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5863
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Florida
Beautiful image!
Harvey Edelman
0145
http://www.harveyedelman.com
 

by DougDolde on Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:09 pm
DougDolde
Forum Contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: 6 Oct 2003
Location: Desert Southwest, USA
Gorgeous rays and sunset. Very nice.
Doug Dolde
http://www.douglasdolde.com
 

by Jens Peermann on Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:09 pm
User avatar
Jens Peermann
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5155
Joined: 5 Apr 2004
Location: Lake Tahoe area of Nevada
This shot is a fitting illustration of the location's name. It was light like this that inspired the name Valley of Fire.

An auto club executive coined it in the 1920s, after driving from Salt Lake City to Las Vegas. The I-15 didn't exist yet. The only road connection between those two cities led him through this bizarre area northeast of Las Vegas. It was late in the afternoon and the low light made the red sandstone cliffs glow like fire. In his journal the executive referred to that area as " Valley of Fire". The name stuck.

Being a frequent visitor to Valley of Fire, I wonder what time of the year this one was taken. Clouds are not very often seen there, February and March offer the best chance for that.


I think your image will be fine without USM. It makes the yellow/orange area around the sun look unnatural, and the halo along the edges of the silhouetted mountains isn't pretty.
A great photograph is absorbed by the eyes and stored in the heart.
 

by Anders on Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:04 am
User avatar
Anders
Lifetime Member
Posts: 862
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Member #:00156
Wow. Good composition!


Anders
 

by Corey Deards on Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:32 am
User avatar
Corey Deards
Forum Contributor
Posts: 372
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Glendale, AZ
Thank you all for the kind words.
Jens, this was taken Thursday evening last week. I used less usm than usual, but agree I could probably have used none.
Corey Deards
[b]The shortest distance between two points is........grossly over rated![/b]
[url]http://www.deardsphotography.com[/url]
 

by Ken Cravillion on Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:01 pm
User avatar
Ken Cravillion
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8534
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Oshkosh!!!
Member #:00072
I like this. The placement of the land is good. The rays are a bonus.
Ken Cravillion
 

by Cindy Marple on Wed Jul 28, 2004 10:03 pm
User avatar
Cindy Marple
Moderator
Posts: 29621
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Member #:00038
Really nice! I like the pano crop. The rays really make the shot.
Cindy Marple
www.cindymarplephoto.com
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
9 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group