Butterfly - EOS 20D Test Shot


Posted by Parrothead Pete on Sat Sep 25, 2004 1:12 am

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 5 posts | 
Image
I'm still learning this puppy. Stopped by butterfly world to try this thing out.

Shot in JPG High.

Canon EOS 20D, 1/200, F/4; ISO Speed 400, 550ex; 70-200 2.8L USM IS w/25mm ext tube.

Sharpened in photoshop cs. Next time over there, I will try RAW mode.
"There are no other Everglades in the world. They are, they have always been, one of the unique regions of the earth; remote, never wholly known. Nothing anywhere else is like them..." - Marjory Stoneman Douglas

Posted by:
Parrothead Pete
Forum Contributor
Location: Miami Lakes, FL
Posts: 4972
Joined: 20 Mar 2004

   

by Ken Cravillion on Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:29 am
User avatar
Ken Cravillion
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8534
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Oshkosh!!!
Member #:00072
Looks good. Needs a bit more DOF though.

I like my 20D! :D
Ken Cravillion
 

by AForns on Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:55 am
User avatar
AForns
Lifetime Member
Posts: 25782
Joined: 7 Dec 2003
Location: Coral Gables, FL
Member #:00233
Looks good Mike no color issues!!!!

When you to for the USM might want to view at 100% since it will be easier to evaluate!!!
Alfred Forns
NSN 0233

In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.
Yogi Berra
 

by E.J. Peiker on Sat Sep 25, 2004 4:22 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
USM won't correct this too well - the real problem is that you weren't totally parallel to the butterfly so the posterior part of the wings were out of the focal plane. The left wing wasn't in the same plane as the right either as the top left part of the wing is also going soft. F/4 is not a good choice for this type of photography due to the shallopw DOF. In this case, since you were using flash anyway and everything is pretty much the same distance from the camera, stopping down to like f/11 or f/16 would be the proper way to take this photo. you can keep the shutter speed at 1/200 and let the flash do the work. Just suggestions for future photos like this, hope you don't mind.
 

by Parrothead Pete on Sat Sep 25, 2004 11:11 pm
Parrothead Pete
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4972
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Location: Miami Lakes, FL
E.J. Peiker wrote:USM won't correct this too well - the real problem is that you weren't totally parallel to the butterfly so the posterior part of the wings were out of the focal plane. The left wing wasn't in the same plane as the right either as the top left part of the wing is also going soft. F/4 is not a good choice for this type of photography due to the shallopw DOF. In this case, since you were using flash anyway and everything is pretty much the same distance from the camera, stopping down to like f/11 or f/16 would be the proper way to take this photo. you can keep the shutter speed at 1/200 and let the flash do the work. Just suggestions for future photos like this, hope you don't mind.
Thanks for the advice. I shot it handheld. I normally don't do these w/o a tripod but you can't take one into butterfly world. I did notice that this lens combo produced a much shallower DOF than on the film camera...I'm so used to the EOS 3 so I have to learn the ins and outs of the 20D and the digital medium.
"There are no other Everglades in the world. They are, they have always been, one of the unique regions of the earth; remote, never wholly known. Nothing anywhere else is like them..." - Marjory Stoneman Douglas
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
5 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group