River Rock Pools


Posted by SteveXs2 on Fri Jul 30, 2004 6:27 pm

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 5 posts | 
Image
Nearly unmodified photo, just Shadow/Highlight and a bit of Levels/Saturation. The colour of the pool water gets me wondering though, while the sunset is a bland yellowish colour, the pools look as if the water is reflecting a purple/red sunset.

Anyways, this was another shot that I took last night. Just ran it through Photoshop today. I'm not sure if this has to be in the 'elements of humankind' gallery though but please note that I didn't intend to use the bridge as the main focal point. I tried to get the focus of the photo to be the rocks at the bottom of the frame but I guess that if there's a bridge in here... it goes into this forum...

Please Comment/Critique.
~ Steve Simons

Canon EOS D30
EF 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 II USM
Optex T265 Tripod
Cokin & Optex Filters

Posted by:
SteveXs2
Forum Contributor
Location: Terrace, BC, Canada
Posts: 67
Joined: 21 Jul 2004

   

by Harvey Edelman on Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:34 pm
Harvey Edelman
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5863
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Florida
Your picture is posted in the right forum :) . The purple/red refection in the water that you referred to is from a magenta cast to the image. I also noticed that in this image as well as the last one your histogram in both cases is just a flat line with no peaks. While there's a small bit of barrel distortion, there's more noticeably a tilt to the right on the horizon. If you look at your foliage, and use your eyedropper you'll find that that whole area is almost pure black. Now not meaning any disrespect, it's easy to know all about PS on an intellectual level and not on a practical, hands on level. It has taken me several years of trial and error and experimentation to acquire whatever skills (or lack of thereof) I have with image editing software.

I redid your image and did the following:corrected the white balance, straightened the tilt, adjusted the levels, highlighted the trees and created a new sky I can throw in a few clouds if you want :D ).

I hope my short treatise is not discouraging but encouraging. The most important thing I did in the beginning (and still do) was and is to look at as many good images as possible and try to assimilate whatever I could.
Image
Harvey Edelman
0145
http://www.harveyedelman.com
 

by SteveXs2 on Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:02 am
SteveXs2
Forum Contributor
Posts: 67
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Location: Terrace, BC, Canada
Harvey Edelman wrote: I redid your image and did the following:corrected the white balance, straightened the tilt, adjusted the levels, highlighted the trees and created a new sky I can throw in a few clouds if you want :D ).
I had my white balance set on Flash because it's pretty close to Sunny in my eyes. I'd also heard that a lot of professional slide films were set for flash also. I set it back to sunny today.

Also, the rotating I did was true to life. The trees are straight (the bottom line), the rock beach is supposed to be off-axis because that's the way it is in real life. But since it does come off as looking off-axis, thanks for noticing, because I never would've noticed it at first.

Your process is nice, but a bit bright for the time of day. It's been a bummer lately though, we haven't got any interesting sunsets lately. Occasionally we'd get some nice ones that are glowing orange, but lately it's been yellow, ugh.
~ Steve Simons

Canon EOS D30
EF 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 II USM
Optex T265 Tripod
Cokin & Optex Filters
 

by Harvey Edelman on Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:06 am
Harvey Edelman
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5863
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Florida
Here's a suggestion Steve. Why don't you just shoot in AWB and shoot in RAW. This way you can convert the Kelvin temperature with software without damaging the original. If flash WB setting looks good in the converted image then you can go with that. If you can afford it, I'd look into buying and downloading Breeze Browser, a conversion program specifically for Canon cameras. It's very easy to use. If you can't afford it at this time then the conversion software that came with the camera will do. If you don't like the color of the sky...then change it. The photo is your interpretation of what you saw. In addition, the camera has a far more limited chroma range than the human eye does. And our brain fills in the blanks.
Harvey Edelman
0145
http://www.harveyedelman.com
 

by SteveXs2 on Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:56 pm
SteveXs2
Forum Contributor
Posts: 67
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Location: Terrace, BC, Canada
Yeah, I've decided I'm going to shoot my landscapes in RAW now. I originally shot RAW with this camera doing all my post processing in BreezeBrowser, but I eventually got tired of converting all of my photos and just shot JPG/Fine instead, metering my own white balance. But I got into some problems with that (using a white card) because I screwed up two shots and am still puzzled as to why. After this outing I'll definitely be shooting RAW when I only need 30 or so photos (all my 128mb card stores).

Thanks for the tips.
~ Steve Simons

Canon EOS D30
EF 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 II USM
Optex T265 Tripod
Cokin & Optex Filters
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
5 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group