Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 17 posts | 
by dougc on Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:29 pm
User avatar
dougc
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1567
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Texas
I picked up one of these after reading about it here and I really like it. Has anyone figured out a practical way to carry it?
 

by E.J. Peiker on Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:43 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
That's the only downside but otherwise it is superior to the most commonly used brand. Three out of the five photographers on the migration shoot I just did last week use the Harbor Design unit.
 

by Greg Basco on Sat Apr 27, 2013 4:22 pm
User avatar
Greg Basco
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2432
Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Member #:01519
EJ, I've been seeing these quite a bit now on my last few workshop tours. It's intriguing. Do you mind elaborating on the ways this new one is superior to the other unit mentioned (the commonly used one)? I appreciate any info you can offer.

Cheers,
Greg
 

by Greg Downing on Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:16 pm
User avatar
Greg Downing
Publisher
Posts: 19318
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Member #:00001
No sag and more consistent lenses :)
Greg Downing
Publisher, NatureScapes.Net
[url=http://www.gdphotography.com/]Visit my website for images, workshops and newsletters![/url]
 

by E.J. Peiker on Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:10 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
What Greg said. ;) The other Greg.
 

by Greg Basco on Sat Apr 27, 2013 8:54 pm
User avatar
Greg Basco
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2432
Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Member #:01519
I think we're all for no sag :-) Thanks, Greg.

Cheers,
Greg
 

by Brian E. Small on Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:49 pm
User avatar
Brian E. Small
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2808
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Member #:00479
Quite simply this is a far superior product to the other "well known" flash extender on the market. Better alignment, no sag, no loss of light as it's enclosed, perfectly fitted to each individual flash rather than a "one size fits about 10 different flashes"............basically agree with E.J. and Greg D.
 

by mikeojohnson on Sun Apr 28, 2013 6:31 am
mikeojohnson
Lifetime Member
Posts: 1220
Joined: 21 Dec 2003
Location: Estero , Florida
Member #:00374
So far, no one has answered the original question. How do you carry it among all the other gear?
mike
"Photography intensifies the experience of life"
http://www.mojphoto.com
 

by layton parham on Sun Apr 28, 2013 10:34 am
layton parham
Forum Contributor
Posts: 95
Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Location: Palm Bay,Florida
Carry it the best way that you can!
Layton Parham http://www.laytonparhamphoto.com
 

by Greg Downing on Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:12 am
User avatar
Greg Downing
Publisher
Posts: 19318
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Member #:00001
Essentially you just need a larger space in your bag, backpack etc. I am still using the visual echoes model myself because I move around a lot but I can see how the harbor digital unit is better once installed. So if portability is the main objective stick with the visual echoes.
Greg Downing
Publisher, NatureScapes.Net
[url=http://www.gdphotography.com/]Visit my website for images, workshops and newsletters![/url]
 

by ChrisRoss on Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:07 pm
ChrisRoss
Forum Contributor
Posts: 13182
Joined: 7 Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Looks like you need a largish space in the bag, you may be able to store it placed over the end of your flash unit, so you would only need a slightly larger space in your bag than what you use now for the flash unit.

On another point, the store states it comes with a black box and a small dome, but searching online I couldn't confirm what they are, assume the dome is to allow it to be used as a diffuser?
Chris Ross
Sydney
Australia
http://www.aus-natural.com   Instagram: @ausnaturalimages  Now offering Fine Art printing Services
 

by Russ on Mon Apr 29, 2013 1:25 am
User avatar
Russ
Forum Contributor
Posts: 321
Joined: 6 Aug 2009
Location: Tacoma, WA area
ChrisRoss wrote:........................................
On another point, the store states it comes with a black box and a small dome, but searching online I couldn't confirm what they are, assume the dome is to allow it to be used as a diffuser?
As I recall from a phone conversation with the owner/designer, note how the flash to fresnel lens distance is shorter on the Harbor Designs unit vs the Better Beamer (BB) unit. Also note how BB recommends that you use a manual focal length setting of 50mm (or 35mm according to some sources) rather than the automated (105mm etc), presumably to spread the flash's light beam out BEFORE it hits the fresnel lens to be refocused. Apparently Harbor Design's use of the Dome diffuser (ie inner Stofen like device) effectively does the same thing. I suspect that EJ's comment about maximizing the flash's distance by removing the insert has to do with the inherent loss of light traveling thru the opaque Dome.

Just today I was using my BB unit and noted a number of small marks on the front of my flash (580EX) unit just above and right of the red AF panel...presumably beginnings of burns from the sun focusing thru the BB's fresnel lens. Not sure why they're showing up there and not on the flash's fresnel panel, but thankful that they're not!

I'm curious as to how/why others report that this "reverse" focusing of the sun onto the flash is NOT a problem using the Harbor Designs unit....isn't it fundamentally the same principle as BB's? Or does the Inner Dome serve as the sacrificial lamb....if used?
 

by ChrisRoss on Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:25 am
ChrisRoss
Forum Contributor
Posts: 13182
Joined: 7 Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
I suspect the dome is not at the focus of the fresnel lens.  This means the sun image is not concentrated enough to burn.  The better beamer fresnel is normally quite good at focusing on the red AF panel as the sun is normally above the beamer lens so this shifts the focused image of the sun downwards below the flash's fresnel panel and on to the red AF panel.

The next question is;  do the diffusers advertised on the Harbour digital site fit the extender.
Chris Ross
Sydney
Australia
http://www.aus-natural.com   Instagram: @ausnaturalimages  Now offering Fine Art printing Services
 

by dougc on Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:33 am
User avatar
dougc
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1567
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Texas
ChrisRoss wrote:
The next question is;  do the diffusers advertised on the Harbour digital site fit the extender.
It's a 4 piece unit; black housing, removable front cover, dome and diffuser come  as a single unit.
 

by Dusty Dog on Wed May 08, 2013 3:22 pm
Dusty Dog
Forum Contributor
Posts: 335
Joined: 17 May 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
I bought the Harbor unit and used it for the first time this past weekend. It's much more secure than BB, in which with the BB, I had to add additional tape and velcro just to keep the darn thing from continually falling off. Also, because it's secured to an enclosed black housing, it will presumably prevent sunburn to your equipment, unless of course your pointing the thing directly at the sun. Having said that, however, I imagine that the unit could end up melting itself if you're not careful. I guess time will tell.
Diane
D3s and a bunch of lenses, legs, lights, and a bag
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed May 08, 2013 5:55 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86788
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Dusty Dog wrote:I bought the Harbor unit and used it for the first time this past weekend.  It's much more secure than BB, in which with the BB, I had to add additional tape and velcro just to keep the darn thing from continually falling off.  Also, because it's secured to an enclosed black housing, it will presumably prevent sunburn to your equipment, unless of course your pointing the thing directly at the sun.  Having said that, however, I imagine that the unit could end up melting itself if you're not careful.  I guess time will tell.
Actually it is much less likely due to the distance that the lens is from the flash.  The optical design of the HD is to mount the lens inside the focal length of the lens so the point of light is never fully concentrated before it hits the flash like it is with the BB.  This can get complicated pretty fast but suffice it to say, it is dramatically less likely to damage your flash due to a difference in the optical design - specifically the focal point for the lens.
 

by Dusty Dog on Fri May 10, 2013 1:33 pm
Dusty Dog
Forum Contributor
Posts: 335
Joined: 17 May 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Thanks, E.J. This is good news.
Diane
D3s and a bunch of lenses, legs, lights, and a bag
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
17 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group