Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 3 posts | 
by E.J. Peiker on Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:00 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86811
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Claimed to be smaller, lighter with higher optical performance - version I was superb so any gains optically are likely to be very minor:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/vi ... gm-ii-lens
 

by Bill Chambers on Thu Aug 31, 2023 2:46 pm
User avatar
Bill Chambers
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4017
Joined: 8 Feb 2006
Location: Milton, Florida
E.J. Peiker wrote: Claimed to be smaller, lighter with higher optical performance - version I was superb so any gains optically are likely to be very minor:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/vi ... gm-ii-lens
A little smaller and 20% lighter.  Lighter is great unless they ditched metal for plastic.
Please visit my web site, simply nature - Photographic Art by Bill Chambers
Bill Chambers
Milton, Florida
 

by Phil Shaw on Fri Sep 01, 2023 4:00 pm
Phil Shaw
Forum Contributor
Posts: 103
Joined: 25 Aug 2003
Member #:00106
I will stick with my v1 untill I see compelling evidence to switch.
Phil Shaw
Essex, UK
[color=#008000][url]http://www.naturephotopro.com[/url][/color]
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
3 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group