« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 42 posts | 
by Neilyb on Wed Oct 25, 2017 2:03 am
User avatar
Neilyb
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2763
Joined: 7 Feb 2008
Location: Munich
Here it is: https://www.dpreview.com/news/342699928 ... ttery-life

I personally am glad to see the resolution stay, hopefully means a leap in Image Quality (they "report" 15-stops of DR). Bigger battery, yay. Faster AF, yay. Touch screen, yay. Dual card slots, yay. 10fps, yay. Joystick, yay. :) (some of these were reported on Tony Northrup's channel)

Also seems the 400mm prime will be f2.8 E.J. ;) and available for the games next year :) https://www.dpreview.com/news/993203527 ... aster-lens

Also a new walkaround lens, which was kind of missing from the FE-mount: https://www.dpreview.com/news/022170226 ... g-oss-lens
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Oct 25, 2017 5:39 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
15 stops of DR is physically impossible with just 14 bit recording, it's marketing mumbo jumbo.  The battery and focus point selection joystick, as well as dual cards and doubling of the frame rate are the big improvements IMHO.  Also the 170 megapixel pixel shift mode for static subjects is a big new feature.
 

by Neilyb on Wed Oct 25, 2017 6:14 am
User avatar
Neilyb
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2763
Joined: 7 Feb 2008
Location: Munich
Yes, I read the 15-stops with some cynicism but the the joystick alone makes the camera way more user friendly. Not sure how useful pixel shift will be, anything moving will mean it shall not work, so any kind of wind in a landscape scene will scupper it.

Look forward to the pricing of the 400mm :o
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Oct 25, 2017 6:35 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
About $12K would be my guess :(
 

by Neilyb on Wed Oct 25, 2017 7:19 am
User avatar
Neilyb
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2763
Joined: 7 Feb 2008
Location: Munich
E.J. Peiker wrote:About $12K would be my guess :(
At least. It will be G Master after all :o

Currently here in Europe the 100-400 is at least 35% more than the Canon, which based on that means the 400 will be around €13 000.... :( (and that will be a minimum I guess). Will make justifying the switch very difficult for anybody pro or not pro.
 

by signgrap on Wed Oct 25, 2017 10:14 am
User avatar
signgrap
Lifetime Member
Posts: 1776
Joined: 1 Sep 2004
Location: Delaware Water Gap, PA
Member #:00424
One omission that I was looking for in the new release was "Focus Stacking". This can't be that hard to include I would think. Is this something that is up-gradable in firmware?
Dick Ludwig
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Oct 25, 2017 10:57 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
signgrap wrote:One omission that I was looking for in the new release was "Focus Stacking". This can't be that hard to include I would think. Is this something that is up-gradable in firmware?
Agreed, yes it's absolutely doable in FW but in general the problem manufacturers have with bringing something like this via a FW update is what do you get rid of.  There is very little space left over in the FW flash on the camera for stuff other than bug fixes unless the manufacturer upfront plans on doing some major feature set updates.  The only two manufacturers that I know of that consciously do that are Fujifilm and Phase One.  So it's likely that if they can do it in FW, you might have to give up smething else.  On the older models they have some reserved on board flash for PlayMemories aps - perhaps they left that additional memory in the camera even though PlayMemories appears to be a thing of the past with this camera (and the a9).
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:09 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Comparison table between a7R Mk II and the new a7R Mk III:
Image
 

by DChan on Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:14 pm
DChan
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2206
Joined: 9 Jan 2009
E.J. Peiker wrote:
... The only two manufacturers that I know of that consciously do that are Fujifilm and Phase One.  So it's likely that if they can do it in FW,...
Olympus added focus bracketing and stacking to its EM-5 Mk II (might be EM 1 also) through firmware upgrade.
 

by signgrap on Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:45 pm
User avatar
signgrap
Lifetime Member
Posts: 1776
Joined: 1 Sep 2004
Location: Delaware Water Gap, PA
Member #:00424
So E.J. do you feel that the improvements in the a7R III are worth shelling out $3,200 for a new camera while you already have a camera with the same sensor, minus some nice upgrades of the new camera?
Dick Ludwig
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Oct 25, 2017 1:04 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
signgrap wrote:So E.J. do you feel that the improvements in the a7R III are worth shelling out $3,200 for a new camera while you already have a camera with the same sensor, minus some nice upgrades of the new camera?
Until I can actually test one myself, I would say maybe.  If you have found the AF and frame rate limiting and are annoyed by the way you select focus points, and the battery life then yes.  If on the other hand, you are fine with the a7R2, you aren't going to get a material increase in image quality unless you shoot still life photos where you can use pixel shift.
 

by signgrap on Wed Oct 25, 2017 1:30 pm
User avatar
signgrap
Lifetime Member
Posts: 1776
Joined: 1 Sep 2004
Location: Delaware Water Gap, PA
Member #:00424
E.J. your response reflects my thinking at this point. The one area where I see improvements that would help me is in taking indoor photos under poor light; where acquiring focus can be a real problem i.e. people/expressions are continually changing and by the time the camera wants to fire the moment has pasted. I do a lot of volunteer jobs of banquets for various non-profits and getting good timing is hard enough but when the light is low it becomes very difficult at times despite having fast primes. So this area has me looking but I'm waiting to see what the real world results show - waiting to hear your analysis.
Dick Ludwig
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Oct 25, 2017 1:45 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
A little digging into the 15 stop dynamic range claim reveals that the way they come up with that is only when you use the pixel shift mode which means instead of recording 14 bits of information for each area in an image that is covered by one pixel - you are recording 56 bits since you are recording an R, a B, and 2 G values each at 14 bits. So in that scenario, yes 15 stops is possible. They sure weren't very clear about that and I feel the 15 bit dynamic range spec should have an asterisk with an explanation. As it stands it is very misleading marketing.
 

by DChan on Wed Oct 25, 2017 2:51 pm
DChan
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2206
Joined: 9 Jan 2009
In low light shooting, a slow shutter speed will slow down the fps. You may get only 5 fps even if your camera can do 10 fps in good daylight outdoor shooting,
 

by mortsgah on Wed Oct 25, 2017 3:56 pm
mortsgah
Forum Contributor
Posts: 80
Joined: 14 Aug 2005
Location: Washington
I'm hoping the AF improvements will improve the "AF hunting" and slower AF than my Canon. I was recently in Costa Rica and tried to use my a7rII hand held with the Sony 90mm macro lens and off camera flash for frogs that were slowly moving up plants and sticks and would miss about 25% of the shots due to the AF not locking in. Tried a variety of the various AF settings but still found it tricky. Granted my 1Dx is designed for faster AF action, but I sure would like to see the new a7 be an improvement in that area. So much easier to hand hold for that kind of work than the big ole 1Dx.
erik
http://www.erikhagstrom.com
 

by signgrap on Wed Oct 25, 2017 6:43 pm
User avatar
signgrap
Lifetime Member
Posts: 1776
Joined: 1 Sep 2004
Location: Delaware Water Gap, PA
Member #:00424
Erik, a macro lens will always be slow to focus because of the long focus travel of a macro lens to get to 1:1.
Dick Ludwig
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Oct 25, 2017 9:38 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
mortsgah wrote:I'm hoping the AF improvements will improve the "AF hunting" and slower AF than my Canon. I was recently in Costa Rica and tried to use my a7rII hand held with the Sony 90mm macro lens and off camera flash for frogs that were slowly moving up plants and sticks and would miss about 25% of the shots due to the AF not locking in. Tried a variety of the various AF settings but still found it tricky. Granted my 1Dx is designed for faster AF action, but I sure would like to see the new a7 be an improvement in that area. So much easier to hand hold for that kind of work than the big ole 1Dx.
You have a combination of a lens not designed for tracking with a camera not designed for tracking there.  The a9 would do much better, probably similar to your Canon but still, macro lenses are simply not designed to do that.   
 

by Bill Chambers on Wed Oct 25, 2017 11:13 pm
User avatar
Bill Chambers
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4015
Joined: 8 Feb 2006
Location: Milton, Florida
E.J., where the figures in your comparison come from? Are they Sony figures or an objective third party?
Please visit my web site, simply nature - Photographic Art by Bill Chambers
Bill Chambers
Milton, Florida
 

by Neilyb on Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:47 am
User avatar
Neilyb
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2763
Joined: 7 Feb 2008
Location: Munich
What I like with Sony is that when the A7rII came out we asked for a touch screen and a joystick to help with AF selection. We asked for more battery life. We need two card slots... and these things happen. A7RIII is a very appealing camera for more than just landscapes.
 

by Andy Trowbridge on Thu Oct 26, 2017 4:16 am
Andy Trowbridge
Forum Contributor
Posts: 991
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
TNeilyb wrote:What I like with Sony is that when the A7rII came out we asked for a touch screen and a joystick to help with AF selection. We asked for more battery life. We need two card slots... and these things happen. A7RIII is a very appealing camera for more than just landscapes.
Didn't get lossless compression of 14-bit RAW files, they obviously weren't listening to that. So it shoots 10fps but only in 12-bit.
All comments & suggestions welcomed and appreciated.
_______________________________________

Andy Trowbridge http://www.andytrowbridge.com 
Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/AndyTrowbridgePhotography
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
42 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group