fbpixel
  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 5 posts | 
by WJaekel on Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:05 pm
User avatar
WJaekel
Forum Contributor
Posts: 462
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Location: Germany
Member #:01354
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=20392
 
Maybe a meaningful upgrade, I don't know. But those who just forked out 4000 € for the new camera can spend another 99.- (or more here in Europe) in July if they want the upgrade for video or just to keep the resale value of the body.

Wolfgang
 

by E.J. Peiker on Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:29 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 79277
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
It does at least bring the 5D4 up to other company's $700 camera standards for 4K ;). It was an almost unforgivable omission from the 5D4. I think it's silly of them to charge for something that virtually every other camera that records 4K has.
 

by Mike in O on Fri Apr 21, 2017 10:37 am
Mike in O
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1855
Joined: 22 Dec 2013
Withholding seems to be the new thing with an add on app...Sony's new A9 is a bare bone 4k (no log for instance).
 

by Neilyb on Sat Apr 22, 2017 4:58 am
User avatar
Neilyb
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2479
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Location: Munich
Fortunately I do not do much video and only do stuff for fun. $99 dollars extra on an already crippled camera? I will wait for Sony to sort out the long primes first.
 

by Joe Subolefsky on Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:15 am
Joe Subolefsky
Forum Contributor
Posts: 27
Joined: 11 Mar 2013
Member #:02098
Mike in O wrote:
Withholding seems to be the new thing with an add on app...Sony's new A9 is a bare bone 4k (no log for instance).



Exactly Sony is going to be charging $1.000.00 more and not including C log. It's all about the money...
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
5 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group