« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 26 posts | 
by DChan on Sat Mar 04, 2017 5:19 pm
DChan
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2206
Joined: 9 Jan 2009
E.J. Peiker wrote:It just means that Camera Raw has not been updated yet to do the RAW conversions.  This is common for very new cameras. 
That is my understanding, too. I was surprised that Affinity Photo could open and process them.
 

by E.J. Peiker on Sat Mar 04, 2017 5:24 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
I doubt that it's optimized though at this early stage.
 

by DChan on Sat Mar 04, 2017 5:28 pm
DChan
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2206
Joined: 9 Jan 2009
E.J. Peiker wrote:I doubt that it's optimized though at this early stage.
You could be right. The ISO 50 file looks all right. But the ISO 3200 and ISO 6400 files look dark and under-exposed in Affinity Photo, nothing like what they appear on Imagingresource.
 

by E.J. Peiker on Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:25 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
I'm guessing they either used SilkyPix or Irrident Developer for the GFX files on Imaging Resource - perhaps they say, I haven't read all the text that goes with their analysis yet.
 

by DChan on Sat Apr 01, 2017 7:06 pm
DChan
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2206
Joined: 9 Jan 2009
Found some reviews of the camera so far:

https://petapixel.com/2017/03/18/review ... um-format/

https://www.engadget.com/2017/03/30/fuj ... 0s-review/

I don't subscribe to diglloyd and so don't know what his thoughts on it so far other than his camera has issues and so he's not exactly thrilled.
 

by DChan on Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:34 pm
DChan
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2206
Joined: 9 Jan 2009
Reviewed by dpreview:

Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
26 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group