Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 124 posts | 
by E.J. Peiker on Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:20 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Workforce is less than 10% of the cost of a product like the 80-400. If people do not buy them at the rate they are being produced then they will cut back production and offer rebates. Keep your eyes tuned to the rebates about 6 months after this lens ships and I bet you will be able to get it for $2400 or less ;)
 

by Baywing on Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:38 am
User avatar
Baywing
Forum Contributor
Posts: 868
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Location: CT
Well, if the rumor of rebate on the new D7100 becomes reality, we may not have to wait long. NR is reporting that the D7100 will sport a $100 rebate at launch.
Photos at: http://www.pbase.com/baywing
 

by E.J. Peiker on Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:42 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Yeah I read that too although I think it only applies to the version that comes with a cheapo kit lens.  Just stupid, if you are offering rebates at market intro it might mean that you overpriced it to begin with...
 

by sdaconsulting on Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:13 pm
sdaconsulting
Forum Contributor
Posts: 579
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Moncure, NC
EJ, those very questionable "inflation" figures from the same insolvent governments that are ramping up the printing presses to pay their bills need to be taken with a whole shaker full of salt.
Matthew Cromer
 

by Baywing on Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:44 am
User avatar
Baywing
Forum Contributor
Posts: 868
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Location: CT
The $100 off instant discount on the D7100 has gone live at Best Buy and new rumor at NR is a $200 off discount on the Coolpix A (based on BB ad). Given that, is a $300-400 instant rebate on the 80-400 in the offing? Time will tell....
Photos at: http://www.pbase.com/baywing
 

by E.J. Peiker on Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:46 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Baywing wrote:  Given that, is a $300-400 instant rebate on the 80-400 in the offing?  Time will tell....
Of course but not at launch IMHO.
 

by Baywing on Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:35 am
User avatar
Baywing
Forum Contributor
Posts: 868
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Location: CT
It sounds like the lens is shipping in the USA with delivery for some pre-orders of today.
Photos at: http://www.pbase.com/baywing
 

by Giulio Zanni on Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:28 am
User avatar
Giulio Zanni
Forum Contributor
Posts: 248
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Location: Bosnia-Herzegovina and Italy
Scott Kelby on D7100 + new 80-400. It does seem as a very nice and portable combo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvK7ixsiEY
www.giuliozanni.com
 

by Neilyb on Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:16 am
User avatar
Neilyb
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2763
Joined: 7 Feb 2008
Location: Munich
Well everything seems fantastic...
 

by E.J. Peiker on Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:57 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Giulio Zanni wrote:Scott Kelby on D7100 + new 80-400. It does seem as a very nice and portable combo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIvK7ixsiEY
Note on his D7100 review where he is raving about the low noise, when he shows you the pictures on the LCD he was shooting in JPEG which has very aggressive noise reduction applied in camera when you get to those ISOs so the whole noise discussion he was having is complete nonsense unless you look at RAWs without in camera NR.  On the lens, you simply can not evaluate overall sharpness on hockey shots where the subject is in the center and the corners are white ice.  I'm sorry but this sounds like a Nikon promo video and not a real objective review.
 

by Mike Gallo on Mon Mar 18, 2013 2:07 pm
User avatar
Mike Gallo
Lifetime Member
Posts: 6604
Joined: 9 Feb 2005
Location: Suburb of Chicago
Member #:00457
I have this combo and like it a lot, af is fast and accurate, lens is a lightweight as is the body (it's all relative)range is very useable in a variety of situations, IQ is OK, probably about the same as the Sig 120-300 os version. As far as noise, I am rather conservative so for me the upper limit is ISO 800, and 400 would be my standard if the light was good.

I am aware that some will push the noise to extreme levels and use noise reduction, however this is just my opinion and the way that I work. YMMV
Just havin' fun
 

by Tim Zurowski on Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:53 pm
User avatar
Tim Zurowski
Forum Contributor
Posts: 18881
Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Location: Victoria BC, Canada
I am one who is still waiting for VR to be added to the 300 f/4. I think I may be waiting forever on that one :( So this new 80-400 intrigues me and raises a few questions:

1) Does anyone know what the minimum focus distance will be at 400mm? Might it be as close as the 300 f/4?

2) Do you think this lens will be as sharp as the 300 f/4 at 300mm? As sharp as the 300 f/4 and 1.4x at 400mm?

If the minimum focus distance is similar and the lens is as sharp, then perhaps it can/will replace the need for VR on the 300 f/4.
 

by E.J. Peiker on Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:44 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
1. A simple look at the specs on Nikon's site says 1.75M for MFD
2. That would be quite a feat. At 300mm the new lens is an f/5.6 lens. At that aperture the 300/4 is already stopped down a stop plus that lens is an exceptionally sharp prime where the new lens is a pretty high zoom ratio zoom. Just looking at the MTF curves reveals that the 300 is better than the 80-400 at either te wide or the long end so there is virtually no way that it will be as sharp as the 300/4. However it has the latest generation VR which, in many situations, will make up for the lower inherent sharpness.
 

by Tim Zurowski on Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:01 pm
User avatar
Tim Zurowski
Forum Contributor
Posts: 18881
Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Location: Victoria BC, Canada
Guess I am still waiting for a 300 f/4 with VR then :(
 

by Baywing on Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:41 am
User avatar
Baywing
Forum Contributor
Posts: 868
Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Location: CT
Shouldn't be too much longer, only took Nikon about 10 years to get afs in the 80-400 so I'm thinking by 2024 give or take a year......
Photos at: http://www.pbase.com/baywing
 

by dougc on Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:14 pm
User avatar
dougc
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1567
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Tim,

Check out the Nikon forum on fredmiranda.com. Sample images from consumers have been posted with and without the TC14E. Pretty impressive.
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:26 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Unless they are giving you 100% RAW files or at least 100% samples of high frequency detail in center and corner, anything posted on the Internet is a meaningless representation of the actual capability of the lens and quite often the emotional attachment of purchasing something clouds the objectivity.
 

by Woodswalker on Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:07 pm
Woodswalker
Forum Contributor
Posts: 432
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
E.J. Peiker wrote:Unless they are giving you 100% RAW files or at least 100% samples of high frequency detail in center and corner, anything posted on the Internet is a meaningless representation of the actual capability of the lens and quite often the emotional attachment of purchasing something clouds the objectivity.
Thanks for saying that. Lots of money has been spent on the basis of sharp, well exposed 500 pixel-wide images.:)
 

by Des on Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:36 pm
User avatar
Des
Forum Contributor
Posts: 989
Joined: 1 Jul 2010
Location: UK
E.J. Peiker wrote:Unless they are giving you 100% RAW files or at least 100% samples of high frequency detail in center and corner, anything posted on the Internet is a meaningless representation of the actual capability of the lens and quite often the emotional attachment of purchasing something clouds the objectivity.
+1.
Regards,

Des
_____________________________________________________________

captivatingnature.co.uk
 

by Bill Lockhart on Thu Mar 21, 2013 3:40 pm
User avatar
Bill Lockhart
Lifetime Member
Posts: 3058
Joined: 29 Sep 2003
Location: Safety Harbor, Florida
Member #:00215
Des wrote:
E.J. Peiker wrote:Unless they are giving you 100% RAW files or at least 100% samples of high frequency detail in center and corner, anything posted on the Internet is a meaningless representation of the actual capability of the lens and quite often the emotional attachment of purchasing something clouds the objectivity.
+1.
Well folks, I ordered one today, that is the 80-400mm.

The lens should arrive Monday or Tuesday of next week.

Give me a day or so to calibrate the lens with my D800 and the D800e, then I will go visit my favorite rookery and take some shots.

Will post RAW files you can download and pixel peep.

Why did I buy it?

VR. I love my 300mm f/4, about as sharp as any lens can be. But, frankly I have missed tons of shots because it has no VR. Grumble.

Reach. The 80-400mm range is perfect for what I do and it replaces two lenses, the 70-200mm VR and the 300mm f/4. One lens, not two. It will save me lots of room and weight when I go to Kenya in May.

New Glass. The lens uses some improved glass elements, that is super ED glass (x1) and ED glass (x4) elements.


Yes, it is expensive. But, you gotta put it into perspective. Ten years ago Gold sold for $400 per ounce, today it is hovering around $1,600. Lenses will not get cheaper.


We will see. It is not a matter of charts, opinions, specs, or anything else, it is about how the lens performs in my hands. If it is half as good as I read, well, I will be pleased to use it as the focal point of my wildlife imaging.


Stay tuned.


Bill
Bill Lockhart
[url=http://www.phototravelreview.com]Photo Travel Review[/url]
[url=http://www.bill.lockharts.com]Personal Website[/url]
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
124 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group