Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 5 posts | 
by spiritofadventure on Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:59 am
spiritofadventure
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1
Joined: 14 Sep 2020
Hi all

Can anyone help me with this choice?

I need to pack light and the budget is low, but I want to extend my system into the telephoto range for wildlife/safari/Africa.

My current system is based around a Pentax K-3 ii with a Sigma 10-20 which is my go-to landscape combination.

I can either get a Sigma 100-300 quite cheaply to fit on the same body (about 1.5 Kg)

or 

(keeping the Pentax), get a Sony RX10 iii (Note: budget won't stretch to the mk iv at the moment) (about 1.2 Kg and potentially much more versatile)

I like to use fast flash which is an added bonus with the RX10 iii, as will the extra nominal reach.

What do you think? Do you think there will be an appreciable difference in IQ/focusing between the two setups?

Thanks for any advice you can give.
 

by Charlie Woodrich on Tue Sep 15, 2020 4:56 pm
Charlie Woodrich
Forum Contributor
Posts: 877
Joined: 22 Jan 2004
Location: Glen Allen, VA
I don't know anything about the first rig but my wife owns the RX10 M3. It's a good camera with a lot of versatility. The one thing that was a negative for me was the battery life. If you go this route, take plenty of batteries
 

by ChrisRoss on Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:08 pm
ChrisRoss
Forum Contributor
Posts: 13182
Joined: 7 Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
It has a significantly smaller sensor than your Pentax it's a 1" sensor 13.2 x 8.8 compared to your Pentax with 25.1 x 16.7mm. Image quality at higher ISO will be less than the APS-C but you can compensate to a certain extent by using wider apertures. At constant depth of field f8 on your Pentax is equivalent to f4.5 on a 1" sensor camera. It depends on your requirements really - if you are only ever looking at images on your computer you mostly won't notice a difference apart from pixel peeping at 100% - if you are printing bigger and pushing the ISO you probably will.
Chris Ross
Sydney
Australia
http://www.aus-natural.com   Instagram: @ausnaturalimages  Now offering Fine Art printing Services
 

by Karl Egressy on Sun Sep 20, 2020 8:01 am
User avatar
Karl Egressy
Forum Contributor
Posts: 39506
Joined: 11 Dec 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Member #:00988
It is not Pentax based, but one of the lightest and best quality very light gear.
Sony a6600 APS-C (1.5 crop factor) camera with a 70-350 mm Sony lens.
The IQ is outstanding.
 

by sdaconsulting on Sun Sep 20, 2020 10:21 pm
sdaconsulting
Forum Contributor
Posts: 579
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Moncure, NC
The RX-10M4 is great when you need really good AF, compact, good IQ and long focal lengths. If you buy used perhaps it can come in at your budget target?

I always take it backpacking when the Sony 200-600 and 100-400 are just way too big and heavy so I can get really long FL landscape images and wildlife photos.
Matthew Cromer
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
5 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group