Above the clouds, the sky is always blue


Posted by Anders on Mon Sep 01, 2003 8:16 pm

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 11 posts | 
Shot this Sunday morning along the ridge of the Santa Cruz mountains.
I know there is a lot of negative space here, but I like it that way... I also like the layered appearance of the forest and the clouds beneath it in the distance.

What do you think?
Image
Canon 10D, EF50/1.8, ISO100, f/8, 1/640
Skyline ridge open space preserve, looking south
(C) 2003, Anders Landin

Please hammer on! Reposts welcome.
Thanks for looking,

Anders

User avatar
Posted by:
Anders
Lifetime Member
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Member #:00156
Posts: 862
Joined: 21 Aug 2003

   

by Kelly on Mon Sep 01, 2003 9:00 pm
User avatar
Kelly
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2382
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Anders, I really like the layers of mountains, the fog, and the pastel colors in the sky. It somehow feels unbalanced though, and I wish I could see more of the trees if possible.
Kelly O'Neill
 

by thapamd on Mon Sep 01, 2003 9:28 pm
thapamd
Regional Moderator
Posts: 775
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, WA (USA)
Member #:00084
It's a nice shot, Anders. One thing bothers me, however. The middle layer of conifers and one of the distant hills looks too light. It may be due to the appearnce of the low lying clouds, but it still looks somehow a bit unnatural...like a poor attempt at dodging. Just something that caught my eye...
Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap, but memories are priceless.

Mahesh (NSN 0084)

http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
 

by Lillian Roberts on Mon Sep 01, 2003 10:38 pm
User avatar
Lillian Roberts
Forum Contributor
Posts: 725
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Location: Palm Springs, CA
I like it very much, though TBH for posting purposes I do prefer to see it cropped to panoramic (I scrolled up and down to see for sure).

FWIW the light looks natural to me. WHether it's haze or mist, it's consistent with mountain scenes I have viewed and photographed.

Lillian
 

by Dan Baumbach on Mon Sep 01, 2003 11:58 pm
User avatar
Dan Baumbach
Forum Contributor
Posts: 596
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Fairfax, CA
The light looks very natural to me. I just saw light similar to this from Mt. Tam this evening.

I like this very much and when a bit of the sky is cropped out to make this more of a panoramic shape, I like it even better.

Good job!

- Dan.
Dan Baumbach
http://www.timelesslight.com
NSN 0069
 

by E.J. Peiker on Tue Sep 02, 2003 12:34 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
I like this and see what you were trying to do here. I think I would like it better with less sky unless there were some clouds to add interest to all of that space.
 

by Andrew Mc on Tue Sep 02, 2003 1:55 am
User avatar
Andrew Mc
Regional Moderator
Posts: 1030
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Member #:00043
Very nice but there's just a fraction too much sky for me - seeing just the tops of the foreground trees really makes me want to see more of them. The layering is great.
Andrew McFadyen | NSN0043
http://www.mcfadyen.org
 

by robert hasty on Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:51 pm
User avatar
robert hasty
Forum Contributor
Posts: 3040
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: bristolp.a
Anders, i must chime in and agree with the others here. Also, is there any way you could have stepped to the right a bit to have the shore/mountain line a little more centered?

robert..........
Robert Hasty
NSN0075


[size=75]
[i] There is a path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture's eye hath not seen:[/i][/size]
 

by Ken Cravillion on Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:39 am
User avatar
Ken Cravillion
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8534
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Oshkosh!!!
Member #:00072
I agree. There is too much sky here. Otherwise it is nice.
Ken Cravillion
 

by Anders on Wed Sep 03, 2003 1:01 pm
User avatar
Anders
Lifetime Member
Posts: 862
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, CA, USA
Member #:00156
Thank you all for the comments. They are most appreciated, as always!

I knew I was breaking 'the rules' with the sky here, but I wanted to convey the feeling of the vast blue sky that I experienced when I took the shot after having hiked up the hill here, but obviously it doesn't work the way I had intended.

Robert, I could unfortunately not have moved right, since this was on a steep hillside and I would rapidly have lost sight of the horizon if I had had a lower position. I have a version of this shot with a much longer lens that focuses more on the area you point to. Also, what you see is not the shoreline - these are clouds covering the valley below... Would be more clear at a higher res image.

Thanks again,

Anders
 

by Juli Wilcox on Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:07 pm
User avatar
Juli Wilcox
Editor in Chief
Posts: 3373
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Location: Upper Great Plains
Member #:00010
What do I think? I love it! Wouldn't change a thing. (Well, OK, there is a dust spot on your sensor, UL towards the top. Sorry :) ) No, I would not crop. If anything I would adjust the midtones to get every fraction of blue out of that sky. To me, it's about the sky and the blue tones in the sky and land.

PS On my Mac monitor, I see many more shades of blue and would not make any adjustments.
[b]Juli Wilcox[/b]
[b]Former Editor in Chief, NSN[/b]
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
11 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group