Clouds over Snoqualmie


Posted by thapamd on Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:24 am

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 25 posts | 
by Bob Ettinger on Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:24 am
Bob Ettinger
Regional Moderator
Posts: 3111
Joined: 19 Aug 2003
Member #:00148
Mahesh,

This one is nice but the larger version really shows it off.
Bob Ettinger
 

by Cindy Marple on Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:31 am
User avatar
Cindy Marple
Moderator
Posts: 29621
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Member #:00038
Thanks, Richard...the larger version would have exceeded the size limit set for image posts here.
The properties of the posted image show it is about 1/2 the size allowed (480 pixels and 49K vs the allowed 650 pixels on max side, 120Kb), your larger image is a larger file size but pixel wise is "legal".
Anyway I only say this because this image is just spectacular and the bigger size shows the detail better. The lighting, composition and choice of shutter speed for the silky water are all superb. I love it! :)
Cindy Marple
www.cindymarplephoto.com
 

by Ken Cravillion on Wed Sep 03, 2003 4:11 pm
User avatar
Ken Cravillion
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8534
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Oshkosh!!!
Member #:00072
I was here a few years ago. Very nice shot.
Ken Cravillion
 

by thapamd on Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:13 pm
thapamd
Regional Moderator
Posts: 775
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, WA (USA)
Member #:00084
Cindy wrote:
Thanks, Richard...the larger version would have exceeded the size limit set for image posts here.
The properties of the posted image show it is about 1/2 the size allowed (480 pixels and 49K vs the allowed 650 pixels on max side, 120Kb), your larger image is a larger file size but pixel wise is "legal".
Anyway I only say this because this image is just spectacular and the bigger size shows the detail better. The lighting, composition and choice of shutter speed for the silky water are all superb. I love it! :)
Thanks, Cindy! Actually the larger version has 800 pixels as the largest dimention, without being a panorama (the width exceeds 400 pixels). The smaller version is just the size generated by my picture hosting site as the "standard" size. I didn't want to store the same image twice, so I just posted the "standard" size and placed a link to the larger version.
Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap, but memories are priceless.

Mahesh (NSN 0084)

http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
 

by Juli Wilcox on Thu Sep 04, 2003 6:57 am
User avatar
Juli Wilcox
Editor in Chief
Posts: 3373
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Location: Upper Great Plains
Member #:00010
The warm, yellowish wash gives this photo the look of an old painting from the Hudsonian Valley. It's an outstanding effect.
[b]Juli Wilcox[/b]
[b]Former Editor in Chief, NSN[/b]
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
25 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group