Wheat Field -- Tech Help Please?


Posted by Lillian Roberts on Fri Sep 12, 2003 10:26 pm

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 9 posts | 
Image
Along the roadside this July as Steve and I meandered our way through Oregon and Washington on our way to Glacier NP. I was drawn to the wheat field that reminded me of growing up in Kansas (such a cliche, I know, but still true!) Only I had to climb quite a hill to get to this wheat field, and then spent the next hour or so picking foxtails out of my socks and pantlegs. I don't remember that in Kansas...

An Oregon wheat field.
10D, Canon 28-135mm lens at 33,mm; ISO 400, f/16 at 125s; hand held.

Lillian


Last edited by Lillian Roberts on Sat Sep 13, 2003 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Posted by:
Lillian Roberts
Forum Contributor
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 725
Joined: 26 Aug 2003

   

by Ken Cravillion on Fri Sep 12, 2003 11:06 pm
User avatar
Ken Cravillion
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8534
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Oshkosh!!!
Member #:00072
Nice shot, seems a bit flat though. I like the large wheat in the FG.
Ken Cravillion
 

by thapamd on Sat Sep 13, 2003 12:41 am
thapamd
Regional Moderator
Posts: 775
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: Seattle, WA (USA)
Member #:00084
Nice shot, Lillian. The horizon looks a bit "light"...seems the transition between it and the upper sky is a bit abrupt.
Shoot in RAW because memory is cheap, but memories are priceless.

Mahesh (NSN 0084)

http://www.StarvingPhotographer.com
 

by robert hasty on Sat Sep 13, 2003 2:43 am
User avatar
robert hasty
Forum Contributor
Posts: 3040
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: bristolp.a
Lillian, the fg is excellent. Im going to guess this was underexposed as it appears to have sime contrast issues from being underexposed. Ive gotten a fair amount of these myself until i started metering correctly with my 10d. It looks as if you tried to dodge the lower portion of the sky as i see some dodge marks? and also, did you use a nd filter for the sky? Seems much darker then then the lower half of the image.

robert...........
Robert Hasty
NSN0075


[size=75]
[i] There is a path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture's eye hath not seen:[/i][/size]
 

by Lillian Roberts on Sat Sep 13, 2003 9:33 am
User avatar
Lillian Roberts
Forum Contributor
Posts: 725
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Location: Palm Springs, CA
OK, since I'm home this weekend ostensibly working on house-improvement project, I'm going to try to learn something.

Maybe it's the image, but I'm betting it's my clumsy PS skills. In the shot I posted, I had adjusted Curves (in lieu of Levels), boosted the Saturation in Reds and Yellows, both <10%, dodged (or is it burned?) the sky to make it darker, and applied USM a few times.

You're right, it's flat. Steve suggested I warm it up more but my response was, it's wheat, that's what color wheat is. I don't think the original was underexposed, probably I tend to darken things too much when I mess with them.

So what would help this one? Reposts definitely invited, please with detailed instructions.
Image
 

by robert hasty on Sat Sep 13, 2003 12:54 pm
User avatar
robert hasty
Forum Contributor
Posts: 3040
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: bristolp.a
Image
Lillian, i first adjusted the contrast on the upside a little bit. Probably a tick to much. Also the brightness a tad. I then went into curves for the blue sky and tweaked it a little bit to bring out some more blue there. I then added a touch of saturation to the blues, then the entire image. I then went into selective colors for the whites, and removed a slight magneta cast in the clouds. USM and wala! Could have probably been done a few different ways and much better im sure, just my take on it with my limited PS6 experience.

robert................
Robert Hasty
NSN0075


[size=75]
[i] There is a path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture's eye hath not seen:[/i][/size]
 

by Dan Baumbach on Sat Sep 13, 2003 1:19 pm
User avatar
Dan Baumbach
Forum Contributor
Posts: 596
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Fairfax, CA
Robert nailed this one. His adjustment is very nice.

- Dan.
Dan Baumbach
http://www.timelesslight.com
NSN 0069
 

by Lillian Roberts on Sat Sep 13, 2003 6:52 pm
User avatar
Lillian Roberts
Forum Contributor
Posts: 725
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Very cool. Most of what you did was what I did, but I went back, strated with the original and followed your steps. I could not match your sky, but it looks a bit greenish to me and I got a mellower blue I like a lot.

Another thing I tend to forget is, I use Adobe RGB as my working space, and sometimes I convert rather than work in, then forget to convert to sRGB before posting. I've noticed that makes the colors look flatter on the web.

Thanks for your input, it helped a lot!
 

by E.J. Peiker on Sat Sep 13, 2003 11:29 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Lillian, if the sky in Robert's repost looks greenish to you something is significantly out of calibration. The tones in your post looks very muted and dark. Robert's colors are much more natural. You may want to take a look at your monitor calibration.
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
9 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group