fbpixel

Moderator: Carolyn E. Wright

All times are UTC - 5 hours

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 4 posts | 
by SantaFeJoe on Sat Dec 22, 2018 7:51 pm
User avatar
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Posts: 6295
Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Member #:01817
Read terms carefully or you may end up like this:

https://petapixel.com/2018/12/22/photog-shocked-after-his-1-88-stock-photo-shows-up-on-walmart-goods/

Joe
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso
 

by Rocky Sharwell on Sun Dec 23, 2018 8:03 am
Rocky Sharwell
Lifetime Member
Posts: 2966
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Member #:00054
A good warning-I have no sympathy for him.
Rocky Sharwell
 

by Jeff Colburn on Mon Dec 24, 2018 3:27 pm
User avatar
Jeff Colburn
Forum Contributor
Posts: 293
Joined: 29 Oct 2010
Location: Cottonwood, Arizona
What, exactly, did he think microstock was? People buy pix for almost nothing, and they can use them in any way they want, for as long as they want. That's what royalty free is.

If he wanted to make extra money with stock, without having the photos available as royalty free, he should have gone through a traditional stock agency.

Since you are paid so little, you need a lot of sales by having a ton of pictures on several microstock sites. One site lists their top contributor as having over 500,000 images uploaded, while another site has a contributor with over 1,000,000 uploaded images. Imagine the time it takes to create a title, description and keywords for that many images. All of that to earn about $0.35 per sale.

Have Fun,
Jeff
Fine Art Prints and Stock Photography of Arizona www.JeffColburn.com See my ebooks in the NatureScapes Store 25 Places To Sell Your Photographs And Photography Skills and The Vanishing Old West - Jerome
 

by 06Honda on Tue Jan 15, 2019 10:34 am
06Honda
Forum Contributor
Posts: 118
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Even magazines use photos from microstock sites, its way cheaper than paying a photographer directly. I was once paid $100 for one Snowy Owl image by Birders World Magazine (now know as BirdWatching Magazine) for a one time use in a mgiration and satellite tracking article. Since then nothing, it looks like from reading the magazine that most or alot of their images come from stock sites due to it being much cheaper for them.
Paul O'Toole
Kingston, Ontario
Nikon D7200
AF-S Nikkor 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
4 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group