White on White (2)

Posted by MoCa on Sun Jan 04, 2004 5:16 pm

All times are UTC-05:00

0 people like this post

First unread post

| 9 posts |

Page 1 of 1

-----------------------------

I'm not sure about the gull on top

can it, or is it disturbing ?
(Background is snow)

Shutter speed: 1/1250 sec
Aperture: 5,0
Exposure mode: Av
Exposure compensation: +1/3
Flash: Off
ISO: 200
Lens: 500,0 mm

Monique, I am packed and ready to go, I may not look like much but I am well behaved and can grow on you like a fungus, with no cure for it!!!
________________
Alex Calzadilla

Posted by:
MoCa
Forum Contributor

Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 356
Joined: 27 Aug 2003

by Campbell on Sun Jan 04, 2004 5:47 pm

Campbell
Forum Contributor

Posts: 4513
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Evanston, Wyoming

Visit website

WOW! Nice. I like the gull on top too. This isa fun looking picture. To me the whole picture sets very well.

Jason Vaclavek
NSN 0062
http://www.JCVPhoto.com

0 people like this post

by Alan Murphy on Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:44 pm

Alan Murphy
Lifetime Member

Posts: 27330
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Member #:00014

View portfolio
Visit website

Monique, the gull on the bottom is so good that it would be better alone IMHO. Great shot.

Alan Murphy
NSN 0014
www.alanmurphyphotography.com

0 people like this post

by Robert Kemmerlin on Sun Jan 04, 2004 6:55 pm

Robert Kemmerlin
Lifetime Member

Posts: 2236
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina
Member #:00076

View portfolio

Great shot, I agree the single gull would be better. I also like it as is so who am I to say!

Robert Kemmerlin

[url=http://www.wildlifesouth.com/]WildlifeSouth - A Nature Photography Journal[/url]

0 people like this post

by ajhand on Sun Jan 04, 2004 7:52 pm

ajhand
Forum Contributor

Posts: 840
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Location: Westport, CT

Moca:

I usually agree with Alan, often choosing nearly the same words he does. When I scrolled down and saw what he had to say, it happened again. The bottom gull is so strong and graphic, it is best surrounded by pure white.

aj

0 people like this post

by BrianS on Sun Jan 04, 2004 9:57 pm

BrianS
Lifetime Member

Posts: 3462
Joined: 29 Oct 2003
Location: Ashburn, VA
Member #:00196

View portfolio
Visit website

I think the thread on this post will split.
I will take the side of going with the gull on bottom alone -- very nice.

[b]Brian Spangler[/b]
[url=http://brianspangler.naturescapes.net][b][u]http://brianspangler.naturescapes.net[/u][/b][/url]
[url=http://www.naturescapes.net/membership.htm][b][u]NSN 0196[/u][/b][/url]

0 people like this post

by DC on Mon Jan 05, 2004 5:27 am

DC
Regional Moderator

Posts: 4273
Joined: 22 Aug 2003

I think the bottom gull would be better alone, although if all of the top gull was in the frame, that would work too.

Dave
Some days you're the bug, some days you're the windscreen

0 people like this post

by AlexC on Mon Jan 05, 2004 2:48 pm

AlexC
Forum Contributor

Posts: 5948
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Member #:00024

View portfolio

The bottom gull would be enough for me!!!
Still I think the Everglades would a great change for you just about now!!!

[b]Alex Calzadilla[/b]
[b]Miami, Florida[/b]
[b]NSN-0024[/b]
"At the feast of ego everyone leaves hungry." - Bentley's House of Coffee and Tea, Tucson, AZ

0 people like this post

by MoCa on Mon Jan 05, 2004 3:10 pm

MoCa
Forum Contributor

Posts: 356
Joined: 27 Aug 2003
Location: Antwerp - Belgium

AlexC wrote:Still I think the Everglades would a great change for you just about now!!!

I'm on the way ..............

Monique, I am packed and ready to go, I may not look like much but I am well behaved and can grow on you like a fungus, with no cure for it!!!
________________
Alex Calzadilla

0 people like this post