10 Toms


Posted by SantaFeJoe on Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:53 pm

All times are UTC-05:00

Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 11 posts | 
Image
Bosque del Apache NWR, February 1991, Minolta X700 100-500 f8 @ 100mm. I don't recall exposure or film. One of my early favorites, but very difficult to process. Scanned on HP.

Copyright Joe A. Roybal
Image
Here's a slightly sharpened version.
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso


Last edited by SantaFeJoe on Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Posted by:
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Location: Somewhere Out In The Wilds
Posts: 8648
Joined: 28 Jan 2012

   

by RLK on Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:58 pm
User avatar
RLK
Forum Contributor
Posts: 3774
Joined: 9 Dec 2009
Location: Washington state
Member #:01370
This is an amazing scene Joe. I wish it was a bit sharper. What film was it shot with originally. I have many transparencies from before digital and have wondered if it was worth scanning them to digital.
Bob
Bob Kothenbeutel
Website (under construction) www.rlkimages.photoshelter.com
 

by SantaFeJoe on Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:13 pm
User avatar
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8648
Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere Out In The Wilds
Bob, I can't recall and I have the transparency stashed away somewhere inaccessible at the moment. I have scanned many slides and am very happy with the results. The most difficult thing in scanning here where it's so dry, is keeping lint and dust from sticking to the film surface. Probably not as much of an issue if you have PS or LR. This one is fairly sharp and has been published, but I don't have PS and I can't process it as well as I would like. It was an early morning scene before the sun came up.

Edit: Slightly sharper version posted above with original version.

SFJ
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso


Last edited by SantaFeJoe on Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 

by Nate Chappell on Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:05 pm
Nate Chappell
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4324
Joined: 3 Jan 2007
Location: Houston, TX and Ecuador
Member #:00835
What a great scene you captured here Joe, a little more room on the bottom would have improved this with the partially cut hens there in the right hand corner.
Nate Chappell
Texas and Ecuador

Birds and Wildlife photo workshops and tours
 

by SantaFeJoe on Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:24 pm
User avatar
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8648
Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere Out In The Wilds
Nate Chappell wrote:What a great scene you captured here Joe, a little more room on the bottom would have improved this with the partially cut hens there in the right hand corner.
Thanks for your comments. There were 21 hens present in the scene, so with a different crop, different hens would be cut off. It happened so quickly and then it was gone. My other shots of the scene look totally different. I was glad to be able to barely fit the toms in the scene. I was just learning then. I wish I had the same opportunities now!!!

SFJ
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso
 

by Greg Basco on Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:36 pm
User avatar
Greg Basco
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2432
Joined: 14 Mar 2004
Location: Costa Rica
Member #:01519
Love it, Joe. I agree that it's a shame about the birds intersecting the bottom of the frame, but I just love the painterly quality to this. Thanks so much for digging this up and sharing it.

Cheers,
Greg
 

by Nate Chappell on Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:39 pm
Nate Chappell
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4324
Joined: 3 Jan 2007
Location: Houston, TX and Ecuador
Member #:00835
The repost looks better to me Joe. I figured that might be the case with the cut off hens, this is often a problem with flock shots. Anyway, it's still a great image.
Nate Chappell
Texas and Ecuador

Birds and Wildlife photo workshops and tours
 

by Ngwinghee on Thu Jan 03, 2013 4:26 am
User avatar
Ngwinghee
Lifetime Member
Posts: 6422
Joined: 3 May 2010
Member #:01457
I prefer the original image as it's darker and shows off well as a painting. Well presented, Joe.
 

by Jim Urbach on Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:26 am
User avatar
Jim Urbach
Lifetime Member
Posts: 29711
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Sanford, Florida
Member #:00049
Love the painterly quality of this image, Joe. All those displaying toms are unique. Prefer the softer OOF BG trees with the sharper toms. With just a bit of PS skills one could clone out the hens completely and repair any tom's feathers.
Enjoy viewing

Jim Urbach

http://www.jimurbach.smugmug.com


http://jimurbach.smugmug.com
 

by Matthew Studebaker on Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:11 am
User avatar
Matthew Studebaker
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8119
Joined: 13 Jun 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Member #:00957
very cool image. Even the sharper shots seems to lack detail though. It's probably just the scan.
Matthew Studebaker
website  | flickr blog | facebook
 

by SantaFeJoe on Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:52 am
User avatar
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8648
Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere Out In The Wilds
Matthew Studebaker wrote:very cool image. Even the sharper shots seems to lack detail though. It's probably just the scan.
It's lack of operator skills! I enjoy doing the photography, but PP is my strong weakness. Technophobia or something!

SFJ
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
11 posts | 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group