Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 38 posts | 

If I could choose one prime lens for wildlife/bird photography, I would choose (in FF terms):
200mm  0%  [ 0 ]
300mm  1%  [ 1 ]
400mm  8%  [ 8 ]
500mm  40%  [ 42 ]
600mm  44%  [ 47 ]
800mm  8%  [ 8 ]
Total votes : 106
by E.J. Peiker on Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:41 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
We haven't had any polls in a while so just for fun...
 

by Mike in O on Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:24 am
Mike in O
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2673
Joined: 22 Dec 2013
That 800 f2.8 looks like the ticket
 

by E.J. Peiker on Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:36 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Mike in O wrote:That 800 f2.8 looks like the ticket
A 800/2.8 would have to have a front element that is almost 300mm wide :)  Would weigh in the 50lb range :o
 

by Mike in O on Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:13 am
Mike in O
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2673
Joined: 22 Dec 2013
E.J. Peiker wrote:
Mike in O wrote:That 800 f2.8 looks like the ticket
A 800/2.8 would have to have a front element that is almost 300mm wide :)  Would weigh in the 50lb range :o

I knew it would be big but wow...I just was pointing out that length needed to be separated with aperture values  :D
 

by Tim Zurowski on Mon Mar 27, 2017 12:08 pm
User avatar
Tim Zurowski
Forum Contributor
Posts: 18881
Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Location: Victoria BC, Canada
Since we're posting wish lenses, I voted 600mm, but only if Nikon or Sigma would make a 600 f5.6 prime.
 

by OntPhoto on Mon Mar 27, 2017 12:31 pm
User avatar
OntPhoto
Forum Contributor
Posts: 7039
Joined: 9 Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario. Canada.
For full frame I selected 600mm but would really go for a zoom instead like the 200-400 or better, the Nikon 200-500 if shooting Nikon. Long primes are so restrictive if you could only carry one lens.
 

by Brian E. Small on Mon Mar 27, 2017 1:49 pm
User avatar
Brian E. Small
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2808
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Member #:00479
E.J.,

I'd guess that if you broke this down into two different categories.................one for birds and one for wildlife you'd get different results.
 

by Anthony Medici on Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:39 pm
User avatar
Anthony Medici
Lifetime Member
Posts: 6879
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Location: Champions Gate, FL
Member #:00012
I consider "wildlife" and "bird Photography" to be to different things. That usually means to different lenses. And location dictates the lens too.
Tony
 

by Mark Picard on Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:50 pm
User avatar
Mark Picard
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2369
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Location: Northern Maine
Although I chose the 500mm prime because it could be handheld fairly easily (I had the 600mm VR - too heavy to handhold for any length of time) and at 500mm it still is a super tele. Add a 1.4x and you're in business. But in reality I purchased a Sigma 150-600mm zoom as I need many focal lengths in the course of the day for my particular style of photography (especially from a kayak). Many times my subject might be too close for a 600mm, so I zoom down to 150mm if needed. But I didn't see a zoom lens in the survey!  :wink:
Mark Picard
Website:  http://www.markpicard.com
Maine Photography Workshops
 

by WDCarrier on Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:03 pm
User avatar
WDCarrier
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1652
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Location: Eureka, California
After looking at the quality of Cindy Crawford's recent black-capped chickadee image taken with the Tamron 150-600 I'd have to think that was a prime contender, esp. if weight is an issue.
[font=Helvetica, sans-serif]“Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” MLK[/font]
 

by lpbiker on Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:52 pm
lpbiker
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4
Joined: 15 Dec 2007
500mm
 

by E.J. Peiker on Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:29 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86761
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Brian E. Small wrote:E.J.,

I'd guess that if you broke this down into two different categories.................one for birds and one for wildlife you'd get different results.
Possibly for some or many but I have never found the requirements to be that different as you are generally much farther from large mammals so in the end, similar focal lengths seem to work, namely usually either a 100-400 class zoom or a 300 and a 500/600/800.  i purposely didn't include zooms on either poll as I was trying to get down to actual focal lengths - basically if you could only have a single focal length, what would it be.  Unfortunately i am limited to 100 characters in the poll question so I couldn't write all of that :)
 

by SantaFeJoe on Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:31 am
User avatar
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8622
Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere Out In The Wilds
In my naiveté as a beginning wildlife photographer, this was my dream lens, especially for small birds. I learned quickly about the reality of long lenses, tripods, practicality of using an extreme telephoto lens, etc. This lens was new at that time:

http://www.popphoto.com/gear/2012/07/in ... 200-1700mm

http://www.cameraegg.org/?attachment_id=1140

Although I currently use a 500mm, I think a 600 with TC is more practical.

Joe
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso
 

by Anthony Medici on Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:49 am
User avatar
Anthony Medici
Lifetime Member
Posts: 6879
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Location: Champions Gate, FL
Member #:00012
E.J. Peiker wrote:
... I have never found the requirements to be that different as you are generally much farther from large mammals so in the end, similar focal lengths seem to work...
Again, that gets down to location and what you are trying to produce. Locations that limit your ability to move (a stick to the road policy, etc) and type of terrain is a bigger factor in how much focal length you need to larger animals.
Tony
 

by rwpontius on Wed Mar 29, 2017 7:44 am
rwpontius
Forum Contributor
Posts: 25
Joined: 13 Sep 2003
I just voted for the 600mm lens. Typically, I shoot most of my wildlife with that lens. Usually I have it on the seat of my car along with the 80-400. Usually between the two I have most situations covered above was well as can be expected. I guess one of the 150-600 lenses might do as well with only one body.
RP
 

by MalcolmBenn on Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:26 pm
User avatar
MalcolmBenn
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1538
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Location: Oakville, Ontario, CANADA
Tough to narrow it down to just one lense given the long list of subject specific variables but I'd go with the 500mm and a 1.4x when needed if I could only take one into the field. If I had a Sherpa to carry the gear I'd also take a 300/2.8 and a 100-400 MII :)
Malcolm Benn

http://www.flickr.com/photos/8357466@N03/
 

by Ed Cordes on Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:58 pm
User avatar
Ed Cordes
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4874
Joined: 11 Mar 2004
Location: Corning, NY
Member #:00700
I chose 500 due to compromise of reach and weight along with maneuverability.  With today's high MP sensors cropping makes this lens more versatile so going to the heavier 600 isn't as necessary as it used to be.
Remember, a little mild insanity keeps us healthy
 

by KK Hui on Thu Mar 30, 2017 6:23 pm
User avatar
KK Hui
Moderator
Posts: 42664
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
Member #:00536
I'd pick a 600/4 for FF.
In reality I use a 500/4 on APS-C body for my avian photography.
Weight is the prime consideration here for me.
KK Hui  FRPS
Fellow of The Royal Photographic Society
Personal Website | Portfolio @ Flickr

Lifetime Member NSN 0536
 

by Tim Zurowski on Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:08 pm
User avatar
Tim Zurowski
Forum Contributor
Posts: 18881
Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Location: Victoria BC, Canada
KK Hui wrote:Weight is the prime consideration here for me.
Same here, which is why I really want a 600 f5.6 ;) I suspect a 600 5.6 would be smaller and lighter than a 500 f/4. Anyone know?
 

by calvin1calvin on Thu Mar 30, 2017 8:57 pm
calvin1calvin
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1137
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Location: Beaumont, TX
Member #:00184
Love my Nikkor 600 f4 but voted for the 500 due to the weight and size difference. My lens performs for me and the cost to replace it with the newer/lighter version does not make sense for me. The Sigma 500 f4 is the new game changer.
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
38 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group