Sigma 24-105 vs Tamron 24-70 vs sigma 24-70? Now problem VC
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:35 pm
Hello..
Bin a while since I was here but know I can always trust this forum
I currently have a Nikon D750 and I have bin shooting primes all my life almost except my 70-200 zoom. Now I have sold my old MF primes because I want to try zoom and be a bit modern with autofokus and stuff hehe.
I am shooting landscapes for the mostly part. Not only big wide landscapes with wide lenses but also mountains with tele. 28mm was the most used lens and after that it was 55. I often felt I sometimes wanted to go down to 24 but never had one so it wasn't possible but that is why I am looking at lenses starting at 24.
They seam so very like in IQ these two lenses. I know about the difference in filter size but I will have to use a step up ring with my 70-200/4 which one I choose so it does not matter but sure there might be some different in cost.
They also weight same, they are the same size, they have both VR and so on and so on. I like the reach on the sigma when traveling. It means I don't need to change lens if it is in a hurry situation if I want some extra mm of reach. I have also noticed some reviews staking that the Tamron suffers from big focus ghosting.
What do you choose. I don't need the 2.8 since I never use that big aperture so is it any idea to choose the Tamron over the Sigma 24-105?
Cheers / Johannes
Ps. I have also looked at the Sigma 24-70 because it is 200 grams lighter and smaller in length. Is that just as good lens in quality as the other two when stopped down to 5,6 and further?
Bin a while since I was here but know I can always trust this forum
I currently have a Nikon D750 and I have bin shooting primes all my life almost except my 70-200 zoom. Now I have sold my old MF primes because I want to try zoom and be a bit modern with autofokus and stuff hehe.
I am shooting landscapes for the mostly part. Not only big wide landscapes with wide lenses but also mountains with tele. 28mm was the most used lens and after that it was 55. I often felt I sometimes wanted to go down to 24 but never had one so it wasn't possible but that is why I am looking at lenses starting at 24.
They seam so very like in IQ these two lenses. I know about the difference in filter size but I will have to use a step up ring with my 70-200/4 which one I choose so it does not matter but sure there might be some different in cost.
They also weight same, they are the same size, they have both VR and so on and so on. I like the reach on the sigma when traveling. It means I don't need to change lens if it is in a hurry situation if I want some extra mm of reach. I have also noticed some reviews staking that the Tamron suffers from big focus ghosting.
What do you choose. I don't need the 2.8 since I never use that big aperture so is it any idea to choose the Tamron over the Sigma 24-105?
Cheers / Johannes
Ps. I have also looked at the Sigma 24-70 because it is 200 grams lighter and smaller in length. Is that just as good lens in quality as the other two when stopped down to 5,6 and further?
