Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 17 posts | 
by Alan Murphy on Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:00 pm
User avatar
Alan Murphy
Lifetime Member
Posts: 27330
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Member #:00014
I think this has a lot of applications. After watching how it worked on a Iphone, I wonder if coating our photo gear with it would be worth it?

http://www.wimp.com/pouringpepsi/
Alan Murphy
NSN 0014
www.alanmurphyphotography.com
 

by E.J. Peiker on Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:53 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Since you spray it on, I would be concerned that it gets into somewhere that you don't want, like optics, sensor, mirror, etc.
 

by Mike in O on Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:50 pm
Mike in O
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2673
Joined: 22 Dec 2013
I would love to have this nano covering sprayed on in the manufacturing process...not sure about afterwards (as EJ said). I think I'm going to buy some for my headlights, nothing will stick...not sure about life expectancy though.
 

by Brian E. Small on Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:30 pm
User avatar
Brian E. Small
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2808
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Member #:00479
This could be really good...............especially if you dropped your gear into a lake or something ;-)
 

by E.J. Peiker on Tue Sep 23, 2014 8:41 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Brian E. Small wrote:This could be really good...............especially if you dropped your gear into a lake or something  ;-)
That never happens!!!!   :lol:
 

by Alan Murphy on Tue Sep 23, 2014 9:03 pm
User avatar
Alan Murphy
Lifetime Member
Posts: 27330
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Member #:00014
Brian E. Small wrote:This could be really good...............especially if you dropped your gear into a lake or something  ;-)

Ha Ha Ha, I guess I teed that up for you :-)
Alan Murphy
NSN 0014
www.alanmurphyphotography.com
 

by ChrisRoss on Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:58 am
ChrisRoss
Forum Contributor
Posts: 13182
Joined: 7 Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Interesting, but on this site

http://www.rustoleum.com.au/index.php/p ... wet-liquid

it says:

"Not intended to be applied to electronic devices or clothing"

MSDS is here:http://www.rustoleum.com/product-catalo ... verwet-kit

Looks like the base coat is polyproylene in a bunch of solvents and the top coat is a silicone style compound.
Chris Ross
Sydney
Australia
http://www.aus-natural.com   Instagram: @ausnaturalimages  Now offering Fine Art printing Services
 

by Scott Fairbairn on Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:53 am
User avatar
Scott Fairbairn
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5131
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Member #:00437
Looks pretty cool, I wonder how toxic it is? It almost makes water behave like a "super fluid."
 

by Jens Peermann on Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:07 am
User avatar
Jens Peermann
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5155
Joined: 5 Apr 2004
Location: Lake Tahoe area of Nevada
E.J. Peiker wrote:
Brian E. Small wrote:This could be really good...............especially if you dropped your gear into a lake or something  ;-)
That never happens!!!!   :lol:
Yeah, you prefer creeks, if I remember correctly. EOS 1, about ten years ago. Right?
A great photograph is absorbed by the eyes and stored in the heart.
 

by ChrisRoss on Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:17 am
ChrisRoss
Forum Contributor
Posts: 13182
Joined: 7 Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Scott Fairbairn wrote:Looks pretty cool, I wonder how toxic it is? It almost makes water behave like a "super fluid."

Read the MSDS in the link above but that is mostly talking about the solvents they use to dissolve the polyprop (non toxic) and silicones that is left behind to do the work.
Chris Ross
Sydney
Australia
http://www.aus-natural.com   Instagram: @ausnaturalimages  Now offering Fine Art printing Services
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:21 am
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Jens Peermann wrote:
E.J. Peiker wrote:
Brian E. Small wrote:This could be really good...............especially if you dropped your gear into a lake or something  ;-)
That never happens!!!!   :lol:
Yeah, you prefer creeks, if I remember correctly. EOS 1, about ten years ago. Right?
EOS 1V, August 2001:
http://www.naturephotographers.net/ejp0901-1.html
 

by Brian E. Small on Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:10 pm
User avatar
Brian E. Small
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2808
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Member #:00479
Alan Murphy wrote:
Brian E. Small wrote:This could be really good...............especially if you dropped your gear into a lake or something  ;-)

Ha Ha Ha, I guess I teed that up for you :-)
Just like at TopGolf.................300 yards right down the middle of the fairway!
 

by Andrew Kandel on Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:17 pm
Andrew Kandel
Forum Contributor
Posts: 881
Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Location: Missoula, Montana
Has anybody here ever had damage from rain or snow with an advertised "sealed" body. My inclination is that it would take a lot of rain to actually penetrate the sealing, but I'm too chicken to actually test the theory.
[url=http://www.andrewkandel.com/]Website[/url] - [url=http://wherebuffaloroam.wordpress.com/]Blog[/url] - [url=https://plus.google.com/112207995176022333771/posts]Google+[/url]
 

by signgrap on Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:47 pm
User avatar
signgrap
Lifetime Member
Posts: 1776
Joined: 1 Sep 2004
Location: Delaware Water Gap, PA
Member #:00424
I'm mystified as to why this would be a good coating for cameras and lenses.
The weak point in weatherproofing camera equipment, is the joints in:
  • focusing ring
  • zoom ring
  • attachment joints of lens to camera
  • any rotating dials
  • shutter release
  • doors and rubber that opens and closes
  • etc.
If you were to coat any of these parts with this stuff the seal that would have been created is instantly broken the moment you rotate a ring or push a shutter. Yes it would easier to clean but as far as an aid in weatherproofing how would it help?
Dick Ludwig
 

by E.J. Peiker on Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:26 pm
User avatar
E.J. Peiker
Senior Technical Editor
Posts: 86776
Joined: 16 Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Member #:00002
Actually the weakest point is the hot shoe and/or pop-up flash.
 

by Rich S on Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:03 pm
User avatar
Rich S
Lifetime Member
Posts: 3833
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: NH & MI
Member #:00019
Andrew Kandel wrote:Has anybody here ever had damage from rain or snow with an advertised "sealed" body.   My inclination is that it would take a lot of rain to actually penetrate the sealing, but I'm too chicken to actually test the theory.
Yes!  And not rain, just sweat, on a Canon 1D4.  Borneo rainforest.  Two years in a row.  (I'm a slow learner.)  And expensive repair because it wasn't fresh water.  :(  Must admit that I'm sorely tempted by the product.
 

by ChrisRoss on Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:43 pm
ChrisRoss
Forum Contributor
Posts: 13182
Joined: 7 Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
You will note that on the Rustoleum website it specifically says it is NOT intended for clothing or electronics, even though the video shows it applied to these same items. If you look closely at the video you'll see where they show it applied to some glass, it is the milky semi opaque perimeter around the piece of glass, so for a start you couldn't apply it over LCD screens or eyepieces. It also would not work on any of the buttons because you are physically moving them and breaking the seal, all the buttons have O rings under them but will suck water through by capillary action if using the button causes a small gap to appear.
Chris Ross
Sydney
Australia
http://www.aus-natural.com   Instagram: @ausnaturalimages  Now offering Fine Art printing Services
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
17 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group