After the Storm, Northern California

Once again...nice rays and light.

Very striking image -- well done!

Another nice one. How do you like the a6000? Seems like a great little camera for the money.

E.J. Peiker wrote:Another nice one.  How do you like the a6000?  Seems like a great little camera for the money.

I think you statement sums up my opinion of the a6000.  It's a lot of camera at a bargain price.  The e mount still has a lack of longer focal length lenses but there are plenty of excellent WA and normal lenses.  I tried the Nikon n1 cameras, was disappointed in the IQ, and found the a6000 is much better.  Packing the camera in the field is really great after using bulky and heavy DSLRs for years.  I'm certainly bullish on the a6000 and wouldn't hesitate to recommend it.

Love those rays.

miker wrote:

E.J. Peiker wrote:Another nice one.  How do you like the a6000?  Seems like a great little camera for the money.

I think you statement sums up my opinion of the a6000.  It's a lot of camera at a bargain price.  The e mount still has a lack of longer focal length lenses but there are plenty of excellent WA and normal lenses.  I tried the Nikon n1 cameras, was disappointed in the IQ, and found the a6000 is much better.  Packing the camera in the field is really great after using bulky and heavy DSLRs for years.  I'm certainly bullish on the a6000 and wouldn't hesitate to recommend it.

You could always put the FE 70-200 f/4 on there which would be a 105-300 f/4 on that camera.

E.J. Peiker wrote:

miker wrote:

E.J. Peiker wrote:Another nice one.  How do you like the a6000?  Seems like a great little camera for the money.

I think you statement sums up my opinion of the a6000.  It's a lot of camera at a bargain price.  The e mount still has a lack of longer focal length lenses but there are plenty of excellent WA and normal lenses.  I tried the Nikon n1 cameras, was disappointed in the IQ, and found the a6000 is much better.  Packing the camera in the field is really great after using bulky and heavy DSLRs for years.  I'm certainly bullish on the a6000 and wouldn't hesitate to recommend it.

You could always put the FE 70-200 f/4 on there which would be a 105-300 f/4 on that camera.

I think it costs close to $1500 and that's more than I can spend.  A friend has one and it's a super lens on both the a6000 and the a7r.  I'm more interested in a 70-300 if they would decide to produce one.

Very inspirational!

Sweet rays. Nicely done.