Moderator: E.J. Peiker

All times are UTC-05:00

  
« Previous topic | Next topic »  
Reply to topic  
 First unread post  | 9 posts | 

What type of lighting do you prefer for mammal and bird photography?
Flat or highly subdued lighting for mammals  33%  [ 12 ]
Bright lighting for mammals (including front, side and backlighting or fill flash)  17%  [ 6 ]
Flat or highly subdued lighting for birds  22%  [ 8 ]
Bright lighting for birds (including front, side and backlighting or fill flash)  28%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 36
by SantaFeJoe on Thu Feb 26, 2015 1:20 pm
User avatar
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8623
Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere Out In The Wilds
I am bringing up this question since I have noticed that a greater number of mammal photos being posted lately have been taken in flat or subdued light. That has never been my preference, but I know others who have claimed to prefer flat light for mammals. Bright light for the purposes of this poll does not refer to harsh light and fill flash does not mean flash lighting only. I know the options of answers in this poll are limited, but you can add opinions in replies below. Two votes are available to you. Thanks for your participation!
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso
 

by Andrew Kandel on Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:31 pm
Andrew Kandel
Forum Contributor
Posts: 881
Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Location: Missoula, Montana
For me, I'd pick a fifth choice called "It depends," based on subject, location and the mood you are attempting to capture.
[url=http://www.andrewkandel.com/]Website[/url] - [url=http://wherebuffaloroam.wordpress.com/]Blog[/url] - [url=https://plus.google.com/112207995176022333771/posts]Google+[/url]
 

by pleverington on Thu Feb 26, 2015 5:43 pm
pleverington
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5355
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Andy makes good point Joe. I can't answer your survey either really. I could maybe based on track history but There's flat light and then there's diffused light. I think they are different. Maybe not, but diffuse is still got brightness to it in my mind and some direction(shadows), but flat wouldn't? Depends on ones definition. I can tell you the very, very, best light though. When there are high cirrus ice clouds way up in the stratosphere diffusing and illuminating things where they seem to glow in their own effervescence. That's the best light.

You know Joe, with all the PP options available nowadays is it even possible to know what the actual light was like in a picture? When looking at others as it were.


Paul
Paul Leverington
"A great image is one that is created, not one that is made"


Last edited by pleverington on Thu Feb 26, 2015 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 

by Tim Zurowski on Thu Feb 26, 2015 6:03 pm
User avatar
Tim Zurowski
Forum Contributor
Posts: 18881
Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Location: Victoria BC, Canada
Count me as another who cannot answer without more details. I cannot really comment on the mammals aspect, as mammal photography is pretty minimal around here, but for birds there are too many variables involved to only have those two choices. For example, if the subject is against the sky or water, then sun is preferred, but then only low sun. If the subject is against the land, then bright cloudy (diffused) weather might be preferred. Most people only prefer "bright lighting" if it is a fairly low sun. So, as mentioned, too many variables to have only two choices.
 

by Blck-shouldered Kite on Thu Feb 26, 2015 6:24 pm
Blck-shouldered Kite
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2669
Joined: 31 Dec 2010
Location: Maine
My favorite outdoor lightings:

1.  Throughout the day: Overcast (diffused), bright overcast....i.e. 100% overcast but bright!

2.  At sunrise and sunset:  Direct lighting (when the sun is low)...side-lighting most favored, but front lighting is fine and backlighting with fill-flash only.

Robert King
http://robertkingimages.smugmug.com/


Last edited by Blck-shouldered Kite on Thu Feb 26, 2015 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
 

by SantaFeJoe on Thu Feb 26, 2015 6:25 pm
User avatar
SantaFeJoe
Forum Contributor
Posts: 8623
Joined: 28 Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere Out In The Wilds
For the purposes of this survey, consider "flat or highly subdued light" to include diffused brighter light, as opposed to direct lighting. The type of light generally preferred for wildflowers and such is what I call subdued.

Also, consider "bright lighting" to not include harsh lighting, as I tried to clarify above. That means, for the most part, side, front and backlight (or rimlight) at a low angle would be considered "bright light".

Sorry, but changes cannot be made to the original survey, so I hope this helps. Thanks for the input and participation so far!

Joe
Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist.  -Pablo Picasso
 

by Blck-shouldered Kite on Thu Feb 26, 2015 6:34 pm
Blck-shouldered Kite
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2669
Joined: 31 Dec 2010
Location: Maine
SantaFeJoe wrote:For the purposes of this survey, consider "flat or highly subdued light" to include diffused brighter light, as opposed to direct lighting. The type of light generally preferred for wildflowers and such is what I call subdued.
Also, consider "bright lighting" to not include harsh lighting, as I tried to clarify above. That means, for the most part, side, front and backlight at a low angle would be considered "bright light".
Sorry, but changes cannot be made to the original survey, so I hope this helps. Thanks for the participation so far.

Joe

Ok...yes....I chose (checked) your "flat or highly subdued light" choice  (for both mammals and birds) because my absolute favorite outdoor light is "bright overcast"...or  "diffused" as Tim said.  I do highly favor it over any direct sunlight.  I love to shoot on bright overcast days!!      Sweeet! :D

BTW......good question Joe.  Interesting post.  Its about time someone asked this one.  This should have a lot of responses.  Have fun!   

Robert King

http://robertkingimages.smugmug.com/

http://itsaboutnature.net/where-have-all-the-butterflies-gone/
 

by Chas on Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:44 pm
Chas
Lifetime Member
Posts: 6891
Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Location: NC
Member #:00037
As wildlife photographers we often have
to adapt to what we are given. Knowing how to make the most of the
conditions in hand is paramount to producing consistently successful
imagery.
Charles Glatzer M.Photog, Canon Explorer of Light, https://about.me/charlesglatzer
Check out www.shootthelight.com for info on workshops, seminars, appearances, etc.
NSN 0037

  
 

by John P on Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:23 am
John P
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2416
Joined: 24 Jan 2006
Location: Maple Grove, MN
I think it is impossible to have this survey with one answer! absolutely depends on the situation.
John P
www.impressionsofnature.net
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:  
9 posts | 
  

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group