Flash
Photography and the Visual System of Birds and Animals
Text copyright Dennis K. Olivero, DVM,
and Donald L. Cohen, MD, all rights reserved
The
use of artificial lighting to photograph animals is an area of controversy.
To review this topic, a basic understanding of the retina is necessary.
BACKGROUND
The retina is comprised of rod cells for night and motion sensory information
and cone cells for daylight and color vision. The ratio of rods and cones
varies by species. Compared to mammals, birds have a greater number of
cone cells allowing greater color perception and visual acuity in daylight.
Nocturnal creatures, by comparison, have a greater rod-to-cone ratio which
allows for better night vision.
In
bright light, rod cells are bleached of rhodopsin, the photoreceptor pigment
important for the translation of light energy into the electrical signals
ultimately recognized by the occipital cortex of the brain. While the
rods are inactive in bright light, the cone cells are responsible for
translating light information into electrical signals. Going from bright
to dark conditions, there is a period of dark adaptation required for
the rod cells to “charge” and become functional. In nature,
the change from light to dark is ordinarily gradual and the concurrent
change from a cone driven electrical response to a signal originating
primarily from rod cells occurs smoothly and without interruption of function.
PERMANENT
DAMAGE
Phototoxic retinopathy, or permanent damage to retinal nerve cells as
a result of light energy, has been studied in humans and other animals.
Extreme unfiltered bright light, focused onto the retina through surgical
microscope lenses has been documented to produce permanent retinal damage.
To cause either microscopically evident or grossly visible lesions, the
light must be held in focus on a single area of the retina for an extended
period of time. This situation generally occurs in specialized surgery,
when anesthetic agents prevent the movement of the eye. Operating microscopes
for ophthalmology are now all equipped with specialized filters to prevent
phototoxic retinopathy even with extended procedures.
Laser,
by definition a highly focused beam of light energy, may produce retinal
damage. In fact, in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy, retinal detachments
and other diseases of the eye, laser is employed to purposefully burn
selected areas of the retina. It is capable of doing this, even with very
brief periods of exposure, because the light is highly focused. Therefore,
when considering the possible damage to the retina by any light source,
both its intensity and degree of focus must be assessed.
FLASH
UNITS
Strobe lights used in on-camera flash units produce a very short duration
burst of light, usually lasting only a small fraction of a second. Strobe
lights are most often used at some distance from a subject and, even with
flash extenders, the light is not focused, but diffused, upon reaching
the subject. The inverse square law for light intensity indicates that
the decay in light intensity occurs as the square of the distance from
its source. Double the distance from the light source to the object and
the object receives only one-quarter the intensity. In other words, the
fall off in intensity is rapid as light leaves the strobe. Even at the
source, the translucent plastic cover overlaying the flash element diffuses
the light immediately.
For
more than 20 years, researchers and clinicians have used the ERG test
(electroretinogram) to study function and diseases of the retina. This
test involves using a strobe light stimulator to record electrical signals
originating from the rods and cones. Protocols vary by testing laboratories.
The rod cells are usually tested by first dark-adapting the subject, i.e.,
placing the subject in a dark room from 5-20 minutes, and then subjecting
the retina to a dim flash of light. The light is increased to full power
and then flickered at 40Hz to isolate the cone cells for testing. The
stimulator or strobe light is generally positioned within a few centimeters
of the cornea for testing. Grass stimulator units produce diffuse light
like a camera strobe, but of much greater intensity. For cone testing,
the full power flash is flickered 40 times per second for several seconds
in duration. Although the light is intense and positioned close to the
subject, it is not highly focused and, consequently, does not permanently
damage the retina.
EFFECTS
OF FLASH
Nature photography subjects may be startled by a sudden unexpected burst
of light; some may depart because of it, others may continue what they
were doing and may not even appear reactive to subsequent use of flash.
Light intensity, degree of focus, and ambient light are all factors when
considering possible impact on visual acuity.
Fill-flash
involves the balance of ambient and artificial lighting. In situations
when fill-flash is used, cone cells are active, and they are designed
to work in all but dim light. Because of this, the use of fill-flash on
animals and birds is not likely to have any effect on their visual systems.
Cone cells do not bleach to a nonfunctional state in bright light as the
rod cells do.
Flash
as main light in dim light conditions can produce a temporary reduction
in vision but not permanent damage.
In
total darkness, use of flash may cause a temporary reduction in vision
for 5-20 minutes. It takes one hour of dark conditioning to achieve maximum
electrical responses from rod cells in the retina. The regeneration of
rod function even after "bleaching" by a bright light is not
linear with time. Animals and birds probably have 50% return of function
in the first five minutes, and 75% in another five minutes. The rods are
rapidly moving from zero function to full sensitivity during that time,
with the greatest return of function per time unit occurring in the first
10-15 minutes.
Because
of the initial impairment of vision from flash in total darkness, repeated
flash of birds or animals in this situation is not advocated. Ethical
nature photographers avoid altering their subject’s behavior. The
judicious use of flash in completely dark situations causing a brief vision
alteration must be offset by the educational value of the photograph made.
Technically excellent pictures of owls and other animals in their natural
environment made at night with flash may, in the end, benefit the species
as a result of increased public awareness. In select situations, the use
of flash may be justified. Many nocturnal species rely upon other senses
in combination with vision during dim or dark conditions; for example,
the auditory capabilities of owls at night are probably far more important
for hunting as compared with the visual sense.
SUMMARY
In summary, to produce phototoxic retinopathy, or permanent damage, a
focused intense light must be held in one location on the retina for a
time several magnitudes greater than the duration of a camera flash. Fill-flash
is not likely to have any effect on visual systems; flash as main light
in dim light conditions may produce a temporary reduction in vision but
not permanent damage. Flash on nocturnal subjects during nighttime should
be used sparingly due to brief impairment of vision.
Flash
does not cause permanent damage to the eyes of animals or people, even
at close range. The eye is developed to handle bright light, such as the
sun. This is the reason the rod cells "turn off" in bright light.
Flash is diffused light when it reaches the subject. Only very highly
focused light, like looking at the sun through your telephoto, or laser
application, would be expected to cause permanent retinal damage.
Hypothetically,
if scientific information indicated that flash photography, under normal
use, produced permanent retinal damage, it would trigger additional rules
and regulations. Flash would not be allowed in making human portraits,
strobe units would be banned from theatres and dance halls, children would
not be allowed to handle cameras and flash units and their instruction
manuals would carry warning labels.
Cell
phone and radio towers, feral animals, air and water pollution, automobiles,
and habitat reduction may be issues of much greater importance confronting
bird and animal subjects than any temporary vision changes associated
with the use of flash in dim or dark light. By limiting our nighttime
use of flash and using fill-flash primarily to enhance ambient light photography,
we hope to produce images of animal and bird subjects that will increase
public awareness and appreciation of nature subjects. By calling attention
to the importance of maintaining a diverse population of birds and animals
on this planet, we may ultimately be able to improve the survival and
quality of life of the subjects photographed.

Dennis
Olivero obtained his DVM degree from the University of Minnesota where
he also did an internship in small animal medicine and surgery. A comparative
ophthalmology residency was completed at North Carolina State University,
followed by a post doctorate NIH fellowship at the University of Minnesota
College of Medicine. Dennis Olivero is a Diplomate of the American College
of Veterinary Ophthalmologists and has served as staff veterinary ophthalmologist
at two veterinary colleges and two private specialty practices. He has
research publications in both the veterinary and human medical field.
Donald
Cohen obtained his doctorate in medicine at State University of New York
in Buffalo and went on to a flexible internship at Mercy Hospital in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. He completed his ophthalmology specialty training at Pittsburgh
Eye and Ear and has been practicing ophthalmology for twenty years in
his clinic in Mooresville, North Carolina.
Dr.
Olivero’s interest in photography dates back to a trip to Africa
in 1978; to see his images please visit his website at www.northernlightnaturephotography.com.
Dr. Cohen’s passion for photography goes back as far as thirty years;
to see his images please visit his website at www.dlcphotography.net.
Feel
free to send your comments on this article to the editors
at NatureScapes.Net.

All
content on this site is copyrighted material as indicated. Unauthorized
use or reproduction is prohibited.
|